Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Tamisha Shaw v. Coast Dental of Georgia et al/
SC Georgia · Jan 6, 2026
GA / stateEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authority
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited "Williams v. Streeval, 301 Ga. App. 455 (2009)" for the proposition that an answer filed without authority is a nullity; court found the named opinion was a non-Georgia trial court opinion and the citation actually points to In re M.O., 301 Ga. App. 453 (2009). Outcome: Monetary Sanction.
- Why the court cared
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited "Williams v. Streeval, 301 Ga. App. 455 (2009)" for the proposition that an answer filed without authority is a nullity; court found the named opinion was a non-Georgia trial court opinion and the citation actually points to In re M.O., 301 Ga. App. 453 (2009). || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited "Fisher v. State, 272 Ga. 883 (2000)" to support authority for invalid unauthorized representation; court found no such Fisher decision exists and the citation actually leads to Mosley v. State, 272 Ga. 881 (2000), which does not support plaintiff's proposition. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited and quoted "Wallace v. Wallace, 271 Ga. 130, 130-31 (1999)" claiming a quote about pleadings filed without authority; court found the quote does not appear in Georgia law and the citation directs to White v. State, 271 Ga. 130 (1999), which is unrelated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited "Gonzalez v. Gonzalez, 277 Ga. 198 (2003)" as reaffirming that courts may strike unauthorized pleadings; court found no Georgia Supreme Court case by that caption and the citation points to Wilson v. State, 277 Ga. 195 (2003), unrelated.
- Why it matters now
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in SC Georgia, with the listed outcome: Monetary Sanction.
Why this matter is tracked
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited "Williams v. Streeval, 301 Ga. App. 455 (2009)" for the proposition that an answer filed without authority is a nullity; court found the named opinion was a non-Georgia trial court opinion and the citation actually points to In re M.O., 301 Ga. App. 453 (2009). Outcome: Monetary Sanction.
Operational lesson
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in SC Georgia, with the listed outcome: Monetary Sanction.
Record details
GeorgiaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtSC Georgia
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit11th Circuit
DateJan 6, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeMonetary Sanction
Known amount$2,632
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Monetary Sanction
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited "Williams v. Streeval, 301 Ga. App. 455 (2009)" for the proposition that an answer filed without authority is a nullity; court found the named opinion was a non-Georgia trial court opinion and the citation actually points to In re M.O., 301 Ga. App. 453 (2009).
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited "Fisher v. State, 272 Ga. 883 (2000)" to support authority for invalid unauthorized representation; court found no such Fisher decision exists and the citation actually leads to Mosley v. State, 272 Ga. 881 (2000), which does not support plaintiff's proposition.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited and quoted "Wallace v. Wallace, 271 Ga. 130, 130-31 (1999)" claiming a quote about pleadings filed without authority; court found the quote does not appear in Georgia law and the citation directs to White v. State, 271 Ga. 130 (1999), which is unrelated.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited "Gonzalez v. Gonzalez, 277 Ga. 198 (2003)" as reaffirming that courts may strike unauthorized pleadings; court found no Georgia Supreme Court case by that caption and the citation points to Wilson v. State, 277 Ga. 195 (2003), unrelated.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Tamisha Shaw v. Coast Dental of Georgia et al/?
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited "Williams v. Streeval, 301 Ga. App. 455 (2009)" for the proposition that an answer filed without authority is a nullity; court found the named opinion was a non-Georgia trial court opinion and the citation actually points to In re M.O., 301 Ga. App. 453 (2009). Outcome: Monetary Sanction.
- Why does Tamisha Shaw v. Coast Dental of Georgia et al/ matter for legal AI risk?
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in SC Georgia, with the listed outcome: Monetary Sanction.
- What does the public record establish about Tamisha Shaw v. Coast Dental of Georgia et al/?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Tamisha Shaw v. Coast Dental of Georgia et al/ summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.