JEAN LUCIEN KIBONDO KILONGOZI v THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
Federal Court · Jul 10, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Federal Court
- Record ID
- jean-lucien-kibondo-kilongozi-v-the-minister-of-citizenship-and-immigration-2026-07-10
- Observed outcome
- The Court identified the cited authority as non-existent and treated it as unreliable; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed related to the fabricated citation.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Adopter's submissions cited a non-existent Federal Court of Appeal decision; the Court expressly found the decision to be inexistent. Outcome: The Court identified the cited authority as non-existent and treated it as unreliable; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed related to the fabricated citation.. In responding to a procedural fairness letter, the adopter (through submissions) cited a purported Federal Court of Appeal decision "Stum c Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration), 2004 CAF 148," which the Court found to be an inexistent decision (a fabricated citation). The Court noted the citation was not real, disregarded it when assessing the fairness and reasonableness of the officer's process, and proceeded without imposing any sanction. The Court relied on the existing record and contemporaneous GCMS notes rather than the fabricated authority.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and trial and records The Court identified the cited authority as non-existent and treated it as unreliable; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed related to the fabricated citation.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and trial with The Court identified the cited authority as non-existent and treated it as unreliable; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed related to the fabricated citation. in Federal Court. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Trial
- Monetary
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The Court identified the cited authority as non-existent and treated it as unreliable; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed related to the fabricated citation.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.