Public trackerCorpus refreshed Aug 22, 2026 · Latest decision Aug 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesJEAN LUCIEN KIBONDO KILONGOZI v THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

JEAN LUCIEN KIBONDO KILONGOZI v THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Federal Court · Jul 10, 2026

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Adopter's submissions cited a non-existent Federal Court of Appeal decision; the Court expressly found the decision to be inexistent. Outcome: The Court identified the cited authority as non-existent and treated it as unreliable; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed related to the fabricated citation.. In responding to a procedural fairness letter, the adopter (through submissions) cited a purported Federal Court of Appeal decision "Stum c Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration), 2004 CAF 148," which the Court found to be an inexistent decision (a fabricated citation). The Court noted the citation was not real, disregarded it when assessing the fairness and reasonableness of the officer's process, and proceeded without imposing any sanction. The Court relied on the existing record and contemporaneous GCMS notes rather than the fabricated authority.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and trial and records The Court identified the cited authority as non-existent and treated it as unreliable; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed related to the fabricated citation.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and trial with The Court identified the cited authority as non-existent and treated it as unreliable; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed related to the fabricated citation. in Federal Court. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Adopter's submissions cited a non-existent Federal Court of Appeal decision; the Court expressly found the decision to be inexistent. Outcome: The Court identified the cited authority as non-existent and treated it as unreliable; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed related to the fabricated citation.. In responding to a procedural fairness letter, the adopter (through submissions) cited a purported Federal Court of Appeal decision "Stum c Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration), 2004 CAF 148," which the Court found to be an inexistent decision (a fabricated citation). The Court noted the citation was not real, disregarded it when assessing the fairness and reasonableness of the officer's process, and proceeded without imposing any sanction. The Court relied on the existing record and contemporaneous GCMS notes rather than the fabricated authority.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and trial with The Court identified the cited authority as non-existent and treated it as unreliable; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed related to the fabricated citation. in Federal Court. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtFederal Court
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateJul 10, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeThe Court identified the cited authority as non-existent and treated it as unreliable; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed related to the fabricated citation.
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

The Court identified the cited authority as non-existent and treated it as unreliable; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed related to the fabricated citation.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Adopter's submissions cited a non-existent Federal Court of Appeal decision; the Court expressly found the decision to be inexistent.

Questions this record answers

What happened in JEAN LUCIEN KIBONDO KILONGOZI v THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION?
Fabricated: Case Law | Adopter's submissions cited a non-existent Federal Court of Appeal decision; the Court expressly found the decision to be inexistent. Outcome: The Court identified the cited authority as non-existent and treated it as unreliable; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed related to the fabricated citation.. In responding to a procedural fairness letter, the adopter (through submissions) cited a purported Federal Court of Appeal decision "Stum c Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration), 2004 CAF 148," which the Court found to be an inexistent decision (a fabricated citation). The Court noted the citation was not real, disregarded it when assessing the fairness and reasonableness of the officer's process, and proceeded without imposing any sanction. The Court relied on the existing record and contemporaneous GCMS notes rather than the fabricated authority.
Why does JEAN LUCIEN KIBONDO KILONGOZI v THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and trial with The Court identified the cited authority as non-existent and treated it as unreliable; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed related to the fabricated citation. in Federal Court. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about JEAN LUCIEN KIBONDO KILONGOZI v THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this JEAN LUCIEN KIBONDO KILONGOZI v THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.