JEAN LUCIEN KIBONDO KILONGOZI v THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
Federal Court · Jul 10, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Adopter's submissions cited a non-existent Federal Court of Appeal decision; the Court expressly found the decision to be inexistent. Outcome: The Court identified the cited authority as non-existent and treated it as unreliable; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed related to the fabricated citation.. In responding to a procedural fairness letter, the adopter (through submissions) cited a purported Federal Court of Appeal decision "Stum c Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration), 2004 CAF 148," which the Court found to be an inexistent decision (a fabricated citation). The Court noted the citation was not real, disregarded it when assessing the fairness and reasonableness of the officer's process, and proceeded without imposing any sanction. The Court relied on the existing record and contemporaneous GCMS notes rather than the fabricated authority.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fake citations and trial and records The Court identified the cited authority as non-existent and treated it as unreliable; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed related to the fabricated citation.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and trial with The Court identified the cited authority as non-existent and treated it as unreliable; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed related to the fabricated citation. in Federal Court. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Adopter's submissions cited a non-existent Federal Court of Appeal decision; the Court expressly found the decision to be inexistent. Outcome: The Court identified the cited authority as non-existent and treated it as unreliable; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed related to the fabricated citation.. In responding to a procedural fairness letter, the adopter (through submissions) cited a purported Federal Court of Appeal decision "Stum c Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration), 2004 CAF 148," which the Court found to be an inexistent decision (a fabricated citation). The Court noted the citation was not real, disregarded it when assessing the fairness and reasonableness of the officer's process, and proceeded without imposing any sanction. The Court relied on the existing record and contemporaneous GCMS notes rather than the fabricated authority.
This matter connects fake citations and trial with The Court identified the cited authority as non-existent and treated it as unreliable; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed related to the fabricated citation. in Federal Court. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The Court identified the cited authority as non-existent and treated it as unreliable; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed related to the fabricated citation.
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Adopter's submissions cited a non-existent Federal Court of Appeal decision; the Court expressly found the decision to be inexistent.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in JEAN LUCIEN KIBONDO KILONGOZI v THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Adopter's submissions cited a non-existent Federal Court of Appeal decision; the Court expressly found the decision to be inexistent. Outcome: The Court identified the cited authority as non-existent and treated it as unreliable; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed related to the fabricated citation.. In responding to a procedural fairness letter, the adopter (through submissions) cited a purported Federal Court of Appeal decision "Stum c Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration), 2004 CAF 148," which the Court found to be an inexistent decision (a fabricated citation). The Court noted the citation was not real, disregarded it when assessing the fairness and reasonableness of the officer's process, and proceeded without imposing any sanction. The Court relied on the existing record and contemporaneous GCMS notes rather than the fabricated authority.
- Why does JEAN LUCIEN KIBONDO KILONGOZI v THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and trial with The Court identified the cited authority as non-existent and treated it as unreliable; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed related to the fabricated citation. in Federal Court. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about JEAN LUCIEN KIBONDO KILONGOZI v THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this JEAN LUCIEN KIBONDO KILONGOZI v THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.