Jessica Baker v. Ryan Joseph Baker
SC Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- SC Pennsylvania
- Record ID
- jessica-baker-v-ryan-joseph-baker-2026-01-07
- Observed outcome
- The Superior Court affirmed the trial court's order, ruling that the appellant's challenges were either moot or unappealable due to the stipulated nature of the custody agreement.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the trial court's order, finding the appellant's challenges to the contempt order moot and the stipulated custody order unappealable. The court explicitly identified that the appellant's appellate brief contained multiple fabricated legal citations that did not correspond to real cases.
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's brief (p.40) referenced authorities the court concluded appeared fabricated and did not support the appellant's arguments. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's brief (p.20) included a legal citation the court determined did not correspond to any real case and appeared fabricated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's brief (p.30) contained a cited authority the court found to be fabricated and unsupported by an actual precedent. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's brief (p.31) referenced case law that the court observed appears to be fabricated and not traceable to real decisions. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's brief (p.33) included citations the Superior Court noted as fabricated and not corresponding to any known cases.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in SC Pennsylvania, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fabricated Legal Citations
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Family
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County, Pennsylvania, following a stipulated custody order and contempt proceedings.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The source does not name a tool, but the nature of the errors implies AI usage.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.