Which source supports this Zoryana Kaspryak v. Mykhaylo Stadarskyy summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesZoryana Kaspryak v. Mykhaylo Stadarskyy

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.

Corpus matter record

Zoryana Kaspryak v. Mykhaylo Stadarskyy

SC Pennsylvania · Aug 19, 2026

PA / state Editorial impact: low pro se fake citations misrepresented authority family Warning

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited "General Fin. Co. v. Archetto, 167 A.2d 306 (Pa. Super. 1961)"; court found the reporter citation corresponds to Slott v. Plastic Fabricators, 167 A.2d 306 (Pa. 1961) and the closest real "Archetto" case is a Rhode Island opinion, indicating a misattributed citation. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in SC Pennsylvania. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in SC Pennsylvania. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

PennsylvaniaSingle-state evidence scope

Explore PAOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.

CourtSC Pennsylvania

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit3rd Circuit

DateAug 19, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited "General Fin. Co. v. Archetto, 167 A.2d 306 (Pa. Super. 1961)"; court found the reporter citation corresponds to Slott v. Plastic Fabricators, 167 A.2d 306 (Pa. 1961) and the closest real "Archetto" case is a Rhode Island opinion, indicating a misattributed citation.
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited "Lowrey v. Eastaff, 860 A.2d 533 (Pa. Super. 2004)"; court concluded this caption appears entirely fabricated and the Atlantic Reporter citation does not match the caption provided.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Zoryana Kaspryak v. Mykhaylo Stadarskyy?: Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited "General Fin. Co. v. Archetto, 167 A.2d 306 (Pa. Super. 1961)"; court found the reporter citation corresponds to Slott v. Plastic Fabricators, 167 A.2d 306 (Pa. 1961) and the closest real "Archetto" case is a Rhode Island opinion, indicating a misattributed citation. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Zoryana Kaspryak v. Mykhaylo Stadarskyy matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in SC Pennsylvania. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Zoryana Kaspryak v. Mykhaylo Stadarskyy?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Zoryana Kaspryak v. Mykhaylo Stadarskyy summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

A.C. Appellant v. H.D. AND J.C.SC Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Jaclyn Cocco v. Rosario Palmieri, Jr.SC Pennsylvania · May 29, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Dorothea Bell v. Kelly BellSC Pennsylvania · May 11, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Jessica Baker v. Ryan Joseph BakerSC Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Bisher v. Civic, et al.SC Pennsylvania · Aug 3, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Saber v. Navy Federal Credit UnionSC Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Corpus snapshot checked Aug 23, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Aug 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Aug 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open SC Pennsylvania profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology