Johnny McMurry, Jr. v. Neiders Company LLC, et al.
W.D. Washington · Aug 14, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- W.D. Washington
- Record ID
- johnny-mcmurry-jr-v-neiders-company-llc-et-al-2025-08-14
- Observed outcome
- The court admonished the plaintiff for citing a non-existent case and warned of potential Rule 11 sanctions; no monetary or professional sanction was imposed.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court admonished the pro se plaintiff for citing a non-existent case in his briefing. The judge explicitly warned the plaintiff that he is responsible for the accuracy of all submissions and that repeating such a transgression could subject him to Rule 11 sanctions.
The court reasoned that the plaintiff is responsible for the accuracy of all submissions and that citing non-existent authority violates the standards expected of litigants, warranting an admonishment and a warning of potential Rule 11 sanctions.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Court admonished plaintiff for citing a non-existent case and warned of potential Rule 11 sanctions; no sanction imposed. in W.D. Washington, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Employment
- Trial
- Warning
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Order on motion to dismiss in a federal civil employment discrimination action.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The source document does not name a tool, but the context of a fabricated citation implies the use of generative AI.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Implement mandatory verification protocols for all case law citations before filing.
- Treat AI-generated research as a draft requiring independent verification against primary legal databases.
- Ensure pro se litigants or junior staff are briefed on the duty of candor and the consequences of submitting unverified authority.