Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Johnny McMurry, Jr. v. Neiders Company LLC, et al.
W.D. Washington · Aug 14, 2025
WA / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsemploymenttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case in his briefing (Dkt. No. 17 at 6); the Court noted the citation was non-existent, admonished Plaintiff, and warned of possible Rule 11 sanctions. Outcome: Court admonished plaintiff for citing a non-existent case and warned of potential Rule 11 sanctions; no sanction imposed..
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Court admonished plaintiff for citing a non-existent case and warned of potential Rule 11 sanctions; no sanction imposed.; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Court admonished plaintiff for citing a non-existent case and warned of potential Rule 11 sanctions; no sanction imposed. in W.D. Washington, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case in his briefing (Dkt. No. 17 at 6); the Court noted the citation was non-existent, admonished Plaintiff, and warned of possible Rule 11 sanctions. Outcome: Court admonished plaintiff for citing a non-existent case and warned of potential Rule 11 sanctions; no sanction imposed..
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Court admonished plaintiff for citing a non-existent case and warned of potential Rule 11 sanctions; no sanction imposed. in W.D. Washington, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
WashingtonSingle-state evidence scope
CourtW.D. Washington
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit9th Circuit
DateAug 14, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeCourt admonished plaintiff for citing a non-existent case and warned of potential Rule 11 sanctions; no sanction imposed.
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Court admonished plaintiff for citing a non-existent case and warned of potential Rule 11 sanctions; no sanction imposed.
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case in his briefing (Dkt. No. 17 at 6); the Court noted the citation was non-existent, admonished Plaintiff, and warned of possible Rule 11 sanctions.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Johnny McMurry, Jr. v. Neiders Company LLC, et al.?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case in his briefing (Dkt. No. 17 at 6); the Court noted the citation was non-existent, admonished Plaintiff, and warned of possible Rule 11 sanctions. Outcome: Court admonished plaintiff for citing a non-existent case and warned of potential Rule 11 sanctions; no sanction imposed..
- Why does Johnny McMurry, Jr. v. Neiders Company LLC, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Court admonished plaintiff for citing a non-existent case and warned of potential Rule 11 sanctions; no sanction imposed. in W.D. Washington, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Johnny McMurry, Jr. v. Neiders Company LLC, et al.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Johnny McMurry, Jr. v. Neiders Company LLC, et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.