Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-04SQOI4Generated September 11, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Kheir v. Titan Team, The Money Source Inc., and Auction.com

S.D. Texas (Bankruptcy) · Nov 6, 2025

Jurisdiction
federal
Court
S.D. Texas (Bankruptcy)
Record ID
kheir-v-titan-team-the-money-source-inc-and-auction-com-2025-11-06
Observed outcome
The court ordered the attorney to reimburse the opposing party's attorney's fees, complete six hours of CLE on generative AI, provide a copy of the order to his client, and referred him to the Chief District Judge and the State Bar of Texas for disciplinary review.
Known monetary consequence
$1
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The court sanctioned attorney Derrick D. King for submitting AI-generated legal filings containing fabricated case law and false quotations. The sanctions include a requirement to pay the opposing party's attorney's fees, six hours of mandatory CLE on generative AI, a client notification requirement, and a referral to disciplinary authorities.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Brasher v. Stewart; Court found no such case and the citation points to an unrelated Sabine Pilot Serv. decision; quoted text not present. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted language attributed to Reinagel; Court found the quoted text does not appear in Reinagel and the actual holding differs. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a definitive statement about 'void assignments' to Morlock; Court found the quoted language not present and that Morlock addressed non-borrower standing. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed liability language to Miller regarding trustee liability under Tex. Prop. Code §51.007(f); Court found Miller did not contain that language or interpret §51.007(f). || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Slaughter v. Qualls for a requirement tied to the Texas Property Code; Court noted the Texas Property Code was not enacted until 1984 and the quoted text is not in Slaughter. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited DTND Sierra Invs., LLC v. BNY Mellon; Court found no such decision at the cited reporter/location and the citation corresponded to unrelated authority; quoted language not found. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Gossett v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp. with a quoted passage; Court found the quoted text not present in the actual Gossett decision and the citation did not support the quoted language.

Why it matters now

This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in S.D. Texas (Bankruptcy), with the listed outcome: Costs Order; 6 hours CLE on generative AI; provide order to client; Bar referral..

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Fake Citations
  • Fabricated Quotes
  • Bar Referral
  • Bankruptcy
  • Trial
  • Monetary
AI attribution
Admitted
Recorded tool
Unidentified generative AI
Known monetary consequence
$1
Procedural posture
Memorandum Opinion and Order following a show cause hearing regarding violations of S.D. Tex. General Order 2025-04 and Bankruptcy Rule 9011.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

Client admitted using generative AI; attorney acknowledged the source.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
  2. Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.
  3. Assign a responsible reviewer for AI-assisted research and drafting.
  4. Escalate and correct a suspect filing promptly, with a documented response.