Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
In re Rosslyn2016, LLC, et al.
S.D. Texas (Bankruptcy) · Jul 14, 2026
TX / federalEditorial impact: highfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritypublished opinion
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Misrepresented: Case Law | Attorney cited 'In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 870 F.2d 343' for attorney-client privilege; court found the citation incorrect/misused—the reported case is Grubbs v. Norris, 870 F.2d 343 (6th Cir.), which does not support the asserted privilege proposition. Outcome: CLE on generative AI; Civil Contempt; Adverse Costs Order.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is CLE on generative AI; Civil Contempt; Adverse Costs Order; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving Westlaw Precision with CLE on generative AI; Civil Contempt; Adverse Costs Order in S.D. Texas (Bankruptcy), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Misrepresented: Case Law | Attorney cited 'In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 870 F.2d 343' for attorney-client privilege; court found the citation incorrect/misused—the reported case is Grubbs v. Norris, 870 F.2d 343 (6th Cir.), which does not support the asserted privilege proposition. Outcome: CLE on generative AI; Civil Contempt; Adverse Costs Order.
Operational lesson
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving Westlaw Precision with CLE on generative AI; Civil Contempt; Adverse Costs Order in S.D. Texas (Bankruptcy), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
TexasSingle-state evidence scope
CourtS.D. Texas (Bankruptcy)
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit5th Circuit
DateJul 14, 2026
WE
AI toolWestlaw Precision
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeCLE on generative AI; Civil Contempt; Adverse Costs Order
Known amount$29,877
Professional sanctionYes
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
Westlaw Precision is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
CLE on generative AI; Civil Contempt; Adverse Costs Order
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Attorney cited 'In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 870 F.2d 343' for attorney-client privilege; court found the citation incorrect/misused—the reported case is Grubbs v. Norris, 870 F.2d 343 (6th Cir.), which does not support the asserted privilege proposition.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Motion quoted 'premature and unauthorized substitute for formal discovery' attributed to In re Dinnubilo; court found the direct quotation does not exist in Dinnubilo or other published opinions.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Motion claimed Table Talk supports limiting Rule 2004 due to 'disproportionate burdens on non-debtor third parties'; court found this was a misrepresentation and that Table Talk rejects the argument.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Motion attributed the statement that Rule 2004 is inappropriate 'when a specific dispute has matured...' to In re Symington; court found the quotation does not appear in Symington.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Motion quoted that Rule 2004 'may not be used as a device for discovery in anticipated litigation' and cited Wilcher and Bennett Funding Group; court found the phrasing/quotation does not exist in those opinions and was misleading.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in In re Rosslyn2016, LLC, et al.?
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Attorney cited 'In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 870 F.2d 343' for attorney-client privilege; court found the citation incorrect/misused—the reported case is Grubbs v. Norris, 870 F.2d 343 (6th Cir.), which does not support the asserted privilege proposition. Outcome: CLE on generative AI; Civil Contempt; Adverse Costs Order.
- Why does In re Rosslyn2016, LLC, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving Westlaw Precision with CLE on generative AI; Civil Contempt; Adverse Costs Order in S.D. Texas (Bankruptcy), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about In re Rosslyn2016, LLC, et al.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this In re Rosslyn2016, LLC, et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.