Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-0PBA032Generated September 27, 2026Evidence checked Sep 27, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP

KB Alberta · Sep 9, 2026

Jurisdiction
international
Court
KB Alberta
Record ID
kostic-v-scott-venturo-rudakoff-llp-2026-09-09
Observed outcome
Fictitious citations undermined the reliability of Kostic’s affidavit evidence
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

Fabricated: Case Law | The plaintiff cited a nonexistent case for the proposition that security for costs cannot be sought while claims remain unresolved. The court found no case named Fitzgerald v The Co-operators General Insurance Company and noted that 2014 ABCA 106 was actually R v TLG, an unrelated criminal case. Outcome: Fictitious citations undermined the reliability of Kostic’s affidavit evidence.

Why the decision-maker cared

The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Fictitious citations undermined the reliability of Kostic’s affidavit evidence. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.

Why it matters now

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Fictitious citations undermined the reliability of Kostic’s affidavit evidence in KB Alberta. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Tort
  • Trial
  • None Adjudicated
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
AI (implied, unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Fictitious citations undermined the reliability of Kostic’s affidavit evidence
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
  2. Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.