Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Posey v. Bushnell
SC Idaho · Sep 22, 2026
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Bushnell cited Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Hawkins. The court found no relevant Idaho case with that name and no reporter citation was provided. Outcome: Appeal affirmed.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Appeal affirmed. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Appeal affirmed in SC Idaho. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Bushnell cited Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Hawkins. The court found no relevant Idaho case with that name and no reporter citation was provided. Outcome: Appeal affirmed.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Appeal affirmed in SC Idaho. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
IdahoSingle-state evidence scope
CourtSC Idaho
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit9th Circuit
DateSep 22, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeAppeal affirmed
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Appeal affirmed
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
8 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Bushnell cited Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Hawkins. The court found no relevant Idaho case with that name and no reporter citation was provided.
- False Quotes: Doctrinal Work | The court found that many of Bushnell’s twenty-two purported quotations from caselaw, statutes, court rules, pattern jury instructions, and the Idaho Constitution were fabricated or inaccurate; only six were accurate apart from minor spelling errors.
- Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Bushnell misrepresented the record by asserting that the district court failed to adopt her requested Idaho Civil Jury Instruction 9.20 punitive-damages instruction. The court found that the district court had adopted the requested instruction.
- Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Bushnell falsely asserted that the district court failed to adopt her truth-as-a-complete-defense instruction, media-defendant instruction, and actual-malice instruction. The court found that the first two instructions had been adopted and that Bushnell had never requested an actual-malice instruction.
- Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Bushnell asserted that the district court applied the law inconsistently because one judge had determined that she was not a media defendant. The court found that no judge had made that determination.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Bushnell cited Jones v. Lynn, 155 Idaho 439, 445 (2013), as authority concerning reversal for voir dire errors without a contemporaneous objection. The court found that no such decision existed; the only Idaho Jones v. Lynn decision was a 2021 summary-judgment case that did not discuss jury selection.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Bushnell cited McAdam v. McAdam as authority that legally inaccurate jury instructions require reversal. The court could not identify the cited case and found that the closest authority, McAdams v. McAdams, concerned child custody and did not address juries or jury instructions.
- Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Bushnell asserted that the verdict form improperly asked the jury to award damages before determining liability. The court found that the district court never provided such a verdict form.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Posey v. Bushnell?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Bushnell cited Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Hawkins. The court found no relevant Idaho case with that name and no reporter citation was provided. Outcome: Appeal affirmed.
- Why does Posey v. Bushnell matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Appeal affirmed in SC Idaho. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Posey v. Bushnell?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Posey v. Bushnell summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.