Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-1SEPO1YGenerated September 10, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Krystle J. Lyons v. Oak Harbor School District

W.D. Washington · Dec 23, 2025

Jurisdiction
federal
Court
W.D. Washington
Record ID
krystle-j-lyons-v-oak-harbor-school-district-2025-12-23
Observed outcome
Amended complaint dismissed with prejudice.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The court dismissed the plaintiff's amended complaint with prejudice after finding the plaintiff failed to state a claim and was not entitled to equitable tolling. The court explicitly noted the plaintiff's reliance on a non-existent case, 'Forbes v. Garza,' in her opposition brief.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's opposition cites a non-existent case 'Forbes v. Garza'; the court notes the case does not exist.

Why it matters now

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in W.D. Washington, with the listed outcome: Amended Complaint dismissed with prejudice..

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Hallucinated_case_law
  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Civil Rights
  • Trial
  • Case Dismissed
AI attribution
Implied
Recorded tool
AI (implied, unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Order granting defendant's motion to dismiss with prejudice.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.