AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 10, 2026 · Latest decision Sep 8, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesKrystle J. Lyons v. Oak Harbor School District
Evidence review: primary document verified. The linked primary document was extracted and checked with page-level evidence locators.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passes the current publication gate; that is not a legal-editorial review or a guarantee that every field has been independently verified.
Corpus matter record

Krystle J. Lyons v. Oak Harbor School District

W.D. Washington · Dec 23, 2025

WA / federalEditorial impact: career endingpro sefake citationscivil rightstrialCase Dismissed
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

The court dismissed the plaintiff's amended complaint with prejudice after finding the plaintiff failed to state a claim and was not entitled to equitable tolling. The court explicitly noted the plaintiff's reliance on a non-existent case, 'Forbes v. Garza,' in her opposition brief.

Why the court cared
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's opposition cites a non-existent case 'Forbes v. Garza'; the court notes the case does not exist.
Why it matters now
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in W.D. Washington, with the listed outcome: Amended Complaint dismissed with prejudice..

Why this matter is tracked

In a civil rights action against a school district, the pro se plaintiff sought equitable tolling for a late filing, citing various legal authorities. The court denied the request, noting that the plaintiff remained highly functional during the relevant period. Additionally, the court observed that the plaintiff's opposition brief cited a non-existent case, 'Forbes v. Garza.' The court ultimately granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the amended complaint with prejudice, finding that the plaintiff failed to state a claim under Title II of the ADA or the Rehabilitation Act, as those statutes do not apply to the employment relationship described in the complaint.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in W.D. Washington, with the listed outcome: Amended Complaint dismissed with prejudice..

Record details

WashingtonSingle-state evidence scope
Explore WAOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtW.D. Washington
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit9th Circuit
DateDec 23, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeAmended complaint dismissed with prejudice.
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

implied

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Order granting defendant's motion to dismiss with prejudice.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's opposition cites a non-existent case 'Forbes v. Garza'; the court notes the case does not exist.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Krystle J. Lyons v. Oak Harbor School District?
The court dismissed the plaintiff's amended complaint with prejudice after finding the plaintiff failed to state a claim and was not entitled to equitable tolling. The court explicitly noted the plaintiff's reliance on a non-existent case, 'Forbes v. Garza,' in her opposition brief.
Why does Krystle J. Lyons v. Oak Harbor School District matter for legal AI risk?
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in W.D. Washington, with the listed outcome: Amended Complaint dismissed with prejudice..
What does the public record establish about Krystle J. Lyons v. Oak Harbor School District?
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Krystle J. Lyons v. Oak Harbor School District summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Jordan Slach v. City of Battle GroundW.D. Washington · Jul 2, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsMerz v. City of KalamaW.D. Washington · Feb 13, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsMitchell Taylor Button et al. v. John Jimison (1)W.D. Washington · Oct 17, 2025same court · pro se + fake citationsBeenshoof v. ChinW.D. Washington · May 15, 2025same court · pro se + fake citationsWilliam Nelson v. Washington Board of Industrial AppealsW.D. Washington · Jun 26, 2025same court · pro se + fake citationsWard v. Amazon.com Services LLCW.D. Washington · Apr 3, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations