Mahala Association (מהל"ה) v. Clalit Health Services et al.
Israel · May 26, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Israel
- Record ID
- mahala-association-מהלה-v-clalit-health-services-et-al-2025-05-26
- Observed outcome
- Class action petition struck from the record; finding that Counsel was not fit to act in this case; Monetary sanctions
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a non-existent Supreme Court case labeled 'Novartis' to support allowance of 'professional appendices'. Opposing party found no such case with that number or party; court found citations and quotes in the response were non-existent. Outcome: Class action petition struck from the record; finding that Counsel was not fit to act in this case; Monetary sanctions.
The Court emphasized that the inclusion of hallucinated sources—regardless of intent—subverted proper legal process. Citations must be verified, and AI does not absolve attorneys from professional responsibility. The systemic risks posed by hallucinated filings necessitate a firm response going forward
Paid 'Takdin AI' tool did not save counsel from 50,000 ILS fine, stricken class action, and personal disqualification; vetted tools demand human verification.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Administrative
- Trial
- Monetary
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- Tachdin.AI
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Class action petition struck from the record; finding that Counsel was not fit to act in this case; Monetary sanctions
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
Tachdin.AI is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Limited (medium confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Escalate unresolved verification failures before filing and preserve the responsible reviewer's signoff record.