Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Vechtel et al. v. Gershoni
Israel · May 25, 2025
IsraelEditorial impact: lowfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritycontracttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Case Law | The motion included a purported quote from a judgment authored by the presiding judge; the court states that quote does not appear in that judgment. Outcome: Motion denied. The judge pointed out that the plaintiffs' written request included what appeared to be a direct quote from one of her own previous judgments. However, upon examination, she found that not only did this quote not exist in the cited judgment, but the judgment itself did not even address the legal question at stake.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether quotations and pincites accurately matched the cited source. The tracked outcome is Motion denied; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Motion denied where pro-se plaintiffs invented a quote from the presiding judge's own prior judgment.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | The motion included a purported quote from a judgment authored by the presiding judge; the court states that quote does not appear in that judgment. Outcome: Motion denied. The judge pointed out that the plaintiffs' written request included what appeared to be a direct quote from one of her own previous judgments. However, upon examination, she found that not only did this quote not exist in the cited judgment, but the judgment itself did not even address the legal question at stake.
Operational lesson
Motion denied where pro-se plaintiffs invented a quote from the presiding judge's own prior judgment.
Record details
CourtIsrael
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateMay 25, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeMotion denied
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Motion denied
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | The motion included a purported quote from a judgment authored by the presiding judge; the court states that quote does not appear in that judgment.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The motion attributed legal determinations about amendment of pleadings to that judgment; the court notes the judgment did not address amendment of pleadings at all.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Vechtel et al. v. Gershoni?
- False Quotes: Case Law | The motion included a purported quote from a judgment authored by the presiding judge; the court states that quote does not appear in that judgment. Outcome: Motion denied. The judge pointed out that the plaintiffs' written request included what appeared to be a direct quote from one of her own previous judgments. However, upon examination, she found that not only did this quote not exist in the cited judgment, but the judgment itself did not even address the legal question at stake.
- Why does Vechtel et al. v. Gershoni matter for legal AI risk?
- Motion denied where pro-se plaintiffs invented a quote from the presiding judge's own prior judgment.
- What does the public record establish about Vechtel et al. v. Gershoni?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Vechtel et al. v. Gershoni summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.