Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-0EASDM1Generated September 11, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Matter of Weber

CC New York · Oct 10, 2024

Jurisdiction
state
Court
CC New York
Record ID
matter-of-weber-2024-10-10
Observed outcome
AI-assisted Evidence Inadmissible; Affirmative Duty to Disclose AI Use for Evidence Established.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

Outcome: AI-assisted Evidence Inadmissible; Affirmative Duty to Disclose AI Use for Evidence Established.. AI UseIn a trust accounting proceeding, the objectant's damages expert testified that he used Microsoft Copilot (described as an AI chatbot) to cross-check his damages calculations presented in a supplemental report.Hallucination DetailsThe issue wasn't fabricated citations, but the reliability and verifiability of the AI's calculation process. The expert could not recall the specific prompts used, nor could he explain Copilot's underlying sources or methodology.…

Why the decision-maker cared

The court emphasized the "garbage in, garbage out" principle, stressing the need for users to understand AI inputs and processes. It stated that the mere fact AI is used does not make its output admissible; reliability must be established. The lack of transparency regarding the AI's process was a key factor in finding the evidence unreliable

Why it matters now

Disclose any AI-assisted evidence before offering it — undisclosed use triggers Frye hearings and automatic exclusion.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Trial
  • None Adjudicated
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
MS Copilot
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
AI-assisted Evidence Inadmissible; Affirmative Duty to Disclose AI Use for Evidence Established.
PRIMARY SOURCE

law.justia.com

Docket or legal-document mirror. The recorded link is hosted by a legal document repository or mirror.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

MS Copilot is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a legal-document or docket mirror. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Latest evidence review: Source Unavailable (medium confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Apply the same source-checking controls to MS Copilot output as to any other research input.
  2. Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.