Moses v. State
CA Tennessee · Feb 25, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- CA Tennessee
- Record ID
- moses-v-state-2026-02-25
- Observed outcome
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the Claims Commission's dismissal of the appellant's case.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court observed that the appellant's brief contained fictitious case citations and citation errors. The court stated it would disregard any legal authorities it could not verify as authentic, though the appeal was ultimately decided on independent procedural grounds regarding the failure to file a compliant certificate of good faith.
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's brief contained at least one fictitious case citation; the court stated it would disregard any authorities it could not verify as authentic.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Tennessee, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Tort
- Appellate
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Appeal from the Tennessee Claims Commission to the Court of Appeals of Tennessee, resulting in an affirmance of the dismissal of the appellant's health care liability claim.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.