AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Aug 5, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 31, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesHarding Place Multifamily Partners v. Samuel Robinson
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 80/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Harding Place Multifamily Partners v. Samuel Robinson

CA Tennessee · Jul 29, 2026

TN / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quoteslandlord tenantNone Adjudicated
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'First Tenn. Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. McClure, 199 S.W.3d 429, 432 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005),' but the citation points to an unrelated Texas opinion and the real McClure decision is from 1990 (No. 169, 1990 WL 6378); court treated this as an invented/misleading citation.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in CA Tennessee. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'First Tenn. Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. McClure, 199 S.W.3d 429, 432 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005),' but the citation points to an unrelated Texas opinion and the real McClure decision is from 1990 (No. 169, 1990 WL 6378); court treated this as an invented/misleading citation.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in CA Tennessee. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

TennesseeSingle-state evidence scope
Explore TNOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtCA Tennessee
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit6th Circuit
DateJul 29, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'First Tenn. Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. McClure, 199 S.W.3d 429, 432 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005),' but the citation points to an unrelated Texas opinion and the real McClure decision is from 1990 (No. 169, 1990 WL 6378); court treated this as an invented/misleading citation.
  2. False Quotes: Legal Norm | Appellant quoted Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-304(a)(4) with language about landlord maintenance of electrical, plumbing, and HVAC, but the actual statutory subsection concerns refuse receptacles; the brief's statutory quotation was false.
  3. Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Puckett v. Estate of Puckett, 174 S.W.3d 252, 257 (Tenn. 2005),' but no Tennessee Supreme Court opinion under that name exists and the reporter page corresponds to a different Court of Appeals opinion; court treated the case name/citation as fabricated.
  4. False Quotes: Case Law | The brief relied on multiple real cases but used false or misleading quotations from those decisions (unspecified individual quotations identified by the court).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Harding Place Multifamily Partners v. Samuel Robinson?
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'First Tenn. Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. McClure, 199 S.W.3d 429, 432 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005),' but the citation points to an unrelated Texas opinion and the real McClure decision is from 1990 (No. 169, 1990 WL 6378); court treated this as an invented/misleading citation.
Why does Harding Place Multifamily Partners v. Samuel Robinson matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in CA Tennessee. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Harding Place Multifamily Partners v. Samuel Robinson?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Harding Place Multifamily Partners v. Samuel Robinson summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Merritt v. MooreCA Tennessee · Jul 21, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsSimmons v. Shahidul IslamCA Tennessee · May 21, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsMoses v. StateCA Tennessee · Feb 25, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsFemhealth USA Carafem v. Rickey Nelson WilliamsM.D. Tennessee · Jan 23, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citationsShantell Robinson v. Oglala Sioux Tribe et al.CA 10th Cir. · Jul 29, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Rose Lannquist Gouldy v. Timothy M. Chiasson, et al.CA Florida (4d) · Jul 22, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)