Mykhal Lloyd Polite v. TitleMax of Arizona
D. Arizona · Jan 23, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. Arizona
- Record ID
- mykhal-lloyd-polite-v-titlemax-of-arizona-2026-01-23
- Observed outcome
- The court denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to file a third amended complaint and ordered the plaintiff to show cause why the case should not be dismissed.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to amend because the proposed complaint was futile and failed to state a viable claim. The court also noted a history of the plaintiff submitting hallucinated case law attributed to AI, which had resulted in the denial of previous motions.
Fabricated: Case Law
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Arizona, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Contract
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The court denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to file a third amended complaint with prejudice and issued a show-cause order regarding potential sua sponte summary judgment.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court referenced prior use of hallucinated cases from purported AI use.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.