Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Bathsheba Nichole Adams v. Kiewit Infrastructure West Company, et al.
D. Arizona · Apr 29, 2026
AZ / federalEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationscontracttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited “Ellsworth v. Am. Arbitration Ass'n, 148 Ariz. 17, 19 (App. 1985),” which the Court found does not exist; the Court identified a likely intended real case as Ellsworth v. Am. Arb. Ass'n, 148 P.3d 983 (Utah 2006) (arbitration issue). Outcome: Motion Struck; Warning.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Motion Struck; Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Motion Struck; Warning in D. Arizona, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited “Ellsworth v. Am. Arbitration Ass'n, 148 Ariz. 17, 19 (App. 1985),” which the Court found does not exist; the Court identified a likely intended real case as Ellsworth v. Am. Arb. Ass'n, 148 P.3d 983 (Utah 2006) (arbitration issue). Outcome: Motion Struck; Warning.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Motion Struck; Warning in D. Arizona, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
ArizonaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtD. Arizona
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit9th Circuit
DateApr 29, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeMotion Struck; Warning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Motion Struck; Warning
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited “Ellsworth v. Am. Arbitration Ass'n, 148 Ariz. 17, 19 (App. 1985),” which the Court found does not exist; the Court identified a likely intended real case as Ellsworth v. Am. Arb. Ass'n, 148 P.3d 983 (Utah 2006) (arbitration issue).
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited “Aguilar v. ASARCO” at 780 F.3d 1101 as a Ninth Circuit case; the Court noted no such Ninth Circuit opinion exists and that 780 F.3d 1101 corresponds to Lary v. Trinity Phys. Fin. & Ins. Services (11th Cir. 2015).
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Bathsheba Nichole Adams v. Kiewit Infrastructure West Company, et al.?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited “Ellsworth v. Am. Arbitration Ass'n, 148 Ariz. 17, 19 (App. 1985),” which the Court found does not exist; the Court identified a likely intended real case as Ellsworth v. Am. Arb. Ass'n, 148 P.3d 983 (Utah 2006) (arbitration issue). Outcome: Motion Struck; Warning.
- Why does Bathsheba Nichole Adams v. Kiewit Infrastructure West Company, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Motion Struck; Warning in D. Arizona, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Bathsheba Nichole Adams v. Kiewit Infrastructure West Company, et al.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Bathsheba Nichole Adams v. Kiewit Infrastructure West Company, et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.