Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-0EDZSJEGenerated September 11, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

N° 2506461

TA Orléans · Dec 29, 2025

Jurisdiction
international
Court
TA Orléans
Record ID
n-2506461-2025-12-29
Observed outcome
The court annulled the administrative orders against the applicant and issued a formal admonishment to the applicant's counsel regarding the submission of fabricated case law.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The court issued a formal admonishment to the applicant's counsel for submitting a series of fabricated and misrepresented case law citations. The judge explicitly identified multiple non-existent or incorrectly referenced decisions from the Conseil d'État, CNDA, and Administrative Courts of Appeal, warning the counsel of the mandatory requirement to verify all legal authorities before submission.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law | Court states this cited CAA Lyon decision with number/date does not exist or numbers do not correspond to dates. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court states this cited Conseil d'État decision with number/date does not exist as indicated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court states this cited CAA Paris decision with number/date does not exist or numbers do not correspond to dates. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court states this cited Conseil d'État decision with number/date does not exist as indicated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court states this cited CAA Bordeaux decision with number/date does not exist or numbers do not correspond to dates. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Court notes this Conseil d'État decision exists but is not on point for an assignation à résidence (misplaced citation). || Fabricated: Case Law | Court states this cited Conseil d'État decision with number/date does not exist as indicated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court states this cited Conseil d'État decision with number/date does not exist as indicated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court states this cited Conseil d'État decision with number/date does not exist as indicated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court states this cited Conseil d'État decision with number/date does not exist as indicated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court states this cited Conseil d'État decision with number/date does not exist as indicated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court states this cited Conseil d'État decision with number/date does not exist as indicated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court states this cited Conseil d'État decision with number/date does not exist as indicated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court states this cited CNDA decision with number/date does not exist or numbers do not correspond to dates. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court states this cited CNDA decision with number/date does not exist or numbers do not correspond to dates. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court states this cited CNDA decision with number/date does not exist or numbers do not correspond to dates.

Why it matters now

Mass-fabricated Conseil d'Etat and CNDA citations now earn formal admonishment from French administrative courts.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Hallucination
  • Misrepresentation_of_authority
  • Fake Citations
  • Misrepresented Authority
  • Administrative
  • Trial
AI attribution
Implied
Recorded tool
AI (implied, unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Administrative litigation regarding the annulment of an obligation to leave French territory, an entry ban, and an order of house arrest.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The court refers to references found by 'any means' and the counsel's failure to verify.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
  2. Retain a matter-level record of source checks and corrections.