HomeCasesTA Orléans, Reconduite à la frontière, n° 2506907

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

TA Orléans, Reconduite à la frontière, n° 2506907

TA Orléans · Jan 7, 2026

FranceEditorial impact: lowfake citationsadministrativetrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 27 juin 2019, n°420269'; the court found that this decision does not exist and urged verification of references. Outcome: Admonishment.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 27 juin 2019, n°420269'; the court found that this decision does not exist and urged verification of references. || Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 12 octobre 2012, GISTI et FAPIL, n° 34728'; the court found that this decision does not exist and urged verification of references. || Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 9 juin 1978, Lebon, n° 05873'; the court found that this decision does not exist and urged verification of references. || Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CAA Lyon, 18 janvier 2022, n° 20LY01957'; the court found that this decision does not exist and urged verification of references.
Why it matters now: French administrative courts now admonish counsel by name for unverified Conseil d'Etat citations; verify every reference pre-filing.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 27 juin 2019, n°420269'; the court found that this decision does not exist and urged verification of references. Outcome: Admonishment.

Operational lesson

French administrative courts now admonish counsel by name for unverified Conseil d'Etat citations; verify every reference pre-filing.

Record details

CourtTA Orléans

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateJan 7, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeAdmonishment

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Admonishment

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 27 juin 2019, n°420269'; the court found that this decision does not exist and urged verification of references.
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 12 octobre 2012, GISTI et FAPIL, n° 34728'; the court found that this decision does not exist and urged verification of references.
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 9 juin 1978, Lebon, n° 05873'; the court found that this decision does not exist and urged verification of references.
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CAA Lyon, 18 janvier 2022, n° 20LY01957'; the court found that this decision does not exist and urged verification of references.

Questions this record answers

What happened in TA Orléans, Reconduite à la frontière, n° 2506907?: Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 27 juin 2019, n°420269'; the court found that this decision does not exist and urged verification of references. Outcome: Admonishment.
Why does TA Orléans, Reconduite à la frontière, n° 2506907 matter for legal AI risk?: French administrative courts now admonish counsel by name for unverified Conseil d'Etat citations; verify every reference pre-filing.
What does the public record establish about TA Orléans, Reconduite à la frontière, n° 2506907?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this TA Orléans, Reconduite à la frontière, n° 2506907 summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

N° 2506461TA Orléans · Dec 29, 2025same court · fake citations + administrative Recurso de Suplicación 0005472/2025T.S.X. Galicia · Jul 7, 2026fake citations + administrative · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)14095863 Canada Inc v Moosehead Breweries LimitedTrademarks Opposition Board · Jul 3, 2026fake citations + administrative · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Chilly Moose Ltd. v Moosehead Breweries LimitedTrademarks Opposition Board · Jun 29, 2026fake citations + administrative · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Moosehead Breweries Limited v 14095863 Canada Inc.Trademarks Opposition Board · Jun 29, 2026fake citations + administrative · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)K.W. v. Ringwood Board of EducationD. New Jersey · Jun 16, 2026fake citations + administrative · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 27 juin 2019, n°420269'; the court found that this decision does not exist and urged verification of references. Outcome: Admonishment.

Operational lesson

French administrative courts now admonish counsel by name for unverified Conseil d'Etat citations; verify every reference pre-filing.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 27 juin 2019, n°420269'; the court found that this decision does not exist and urged verification of references.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 12 octobre 2012, GISTI et FAPIL, n° 34728'; the court found that this decision does not exist and urged verification of references.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 9 juin 1978, Lebon, n° 05873'; the court found that this decision does not exist and urged verification of references.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CAA Lyon, 18 janvier 2022, n° 20LY01957'; the court found that this decision does not exist and urged verification of references.

Questions this record answers

What happened in TA Orléans, Reconduite à la frontière, n° 2506907?

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 27 juin 2019, n°420269'; the court found that this decision does not exist and urged verification of references. Outcome: Admonishment.

Why does TA Orléans, Reconduite à la frontière, n° 2506907 matter for legal AI risk?

French administrative courts now admonish counsel by name for unverified Conseil d'Etat citations; verify every reference pre-filing.

What does the public record establish about TA Orléans, Reconduite à la frontière, n° 2506907?

Which source supports this TA Orléans, Reconduite à la frontière, n° 2506907 summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.