N° 2509827
TA Grenoble · Dec 3, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- TA Grenoble
- Record ID
- n-2509827-2025-12-03
- Observed outcome
- None Adjudicated
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
In TA Grenoble No. 2509827, a person challenged a EUR 500 administrative fine imposed by the mayor of Saint-Cergues. The tribunal found the filing unclear because it had apparently been drafted with generative AI and identified fantasy judicial references in the argument. It rejected the application after the claimant failed to produce the challenged decision and the remaining grounds were manifestly unsupported.
Fabricated: Case Law
French administrative tribunals are now documenting AI fabrications in pro-se filings; precedent is spreading across civil-law jurisdictions.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- No tool named in source
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
justice.pappers.fr
Secondary or other linked source. The recorded link is not classified as an official court source or docket mirror.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Source Unavailable (medium confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.