Neill-Fraser v Tasmania Parole Board
Supreme Court of Tasmania · Sep 15, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Supreme Court of Tasmania
- Record ID
- neill-fraser-v-tasmania-parole-board-2026-09-15
- Observed outcome
- Gag-order condition set aside
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | The rationale document cited purported supporting cases that did not exist. The court challenge identified the citations as fabricated, and the condition relying on the document was set aside. Outcome: Gag-order condition set aside. As reported by local media, a rationale document prepared by the parole board secretary and relied upon to impose media-related parole conditions cited cases that did not exist and included AI-generated examples of similar conditions. The issue was identified during Neill-Fraser's legal challenge, and the Supreme Court of Tasmania set the condition aside, finding it procedurally unfair, legally unreasonable, and uncertain. The board had already withdrawn the condition and did not contest its formal removal.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and trial and records Gag-order condition set aside. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and trial with Gag-order condition set aside in Supreme Court of Tasmania. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Gag-order condition set aside
perthnow.com.au
Secondary or other linked source. The recorded link is not classified as an official court source or docket mirror.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a secondary public source and should be checked against the docket where available. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.