AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 26, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 23, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesOmkara Assets Reconstruction Private Limited v. Gstaad Hotels Private Limited
Evidence review: metadata only. The linked page is generic, shared, or insufficiently case-specific. This page therefore preserves only the structured corpus baseline.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Omkara Assets Reconstruction Private Limited v. Gstaad Hotels Private Limited

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

Supreme Court · Oct 15, 2026

IndiaEditorial impact: lowfake citationstrialNone Adjudicated
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

In its 15 October 2026 judgment (Deepak Raheja v. Omkara Assets Reconstruction, C.A. No. 12195/2025, 2026 INSC 1134, para 74) the Supreme Court of India records that the appellants' compilation of judgments was objected to as replete with AI-generated non-existent judgments, calls it an undesirable incident, and imposes no sanction: costs that had been proposed were dropped after the first appellant's death.

Why the court cared
Fabricated: Case Law
Why it matters now
The Supreme Court of India treated a compilation containing AI-generated non-existent judgments as an undesirable incident, with exemplary costs proposed before the death of the first appellant ended them; verify every authority in a compilation before it is filed.

Why this matter is tracked

In its 15 October 2026 judgment (Deepak Raheja v. Omkara Assets Reconstruction, C.A. No. 12195/2025, 2026 INSC 1134, para 74) the Supreme Court of India records that the appellants' compilation of judgments was objected to as replete with AI-generated non-existent judgments, calls it an undesirable incident, and imposes no sanction: costs that had been proposed were dropped after the first appellant's death.

Operational lesson

The Supreme Court of India treats a compilation with AI-generated non-existent judgments as an undesirable incident, even where no sanction ends up imposed; verify every authority in a compilation before filing.

Record details

CourtSupreme Court
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateOct 15, 2026
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeNo sanction: the Court called the compilation with AI-generated non-existent judgments an 'undesirable incident'; a heavier response was proposed but dropped, and nothing was imposed after the first appellant's death (judgment of 15 Oct 2026, para 74)
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

No sanction: the Court called the compilation with AI-generated non-existent judgments an 'undesirable incident'; a heavier response was proposed but dropped, and nothing was imposed after the first appellant's death (judgment of 15 Oct 2026, para 74)

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law

Questions this record answers

What happened in Omkara Assets Reconstruction Private Limited v. Gstaad Hotels Private Limited?
In its 15 October 2026 judgment (Deepak Raheja v. Omkara Assets Reconstruction, C.A. No. 12195/2025, 2026 INSC 1134, para 74) the Supreme Court of India records that the appellants' compilation of judgments was objected to as replete with AI-generated non-existent judgments, calls it an undesirable incident, and imposes no sanction: costs that had been proposed were dropped after the first appellant's death.
Why does Omkara Assets Reconstruction Private Limited v. Gstaad Hotels Private Limited matter for legal AI risk?
The Supreme Court of India treated a compilation containing AI-generated non-existent judgments as an undesirable incident, with exemplary costs proposed before the death of the first appellant ended them; verify every authority in a compilation before it is filed.
What does the public record establish about Omkara Assets Reconstruction Private Limited v. Gstaad Hotels Private Limited?
Date and outcome corrected 25 Oct 2026 from para 74 of the judgment (a third-party copy of the Court's PDF; sci.gov.in not reached); the upstream 8 Dec 2025 hearing date and 'Warning (during hearing)' are not in the judgment. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Omkara Assets Reconstruction Private Limited v. Gstaad Hotels Private Limited summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Case No. 14748-08-21Supreme Court · Jul 9, 2025same court · fake citations + trialPooja Ramesh Singh v. Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. & Anr.Supreme Court · Jul 2, 2026same court · fake citations + trialPooja Ramesh Singh v. Jammu & Kashmir BankSupreme Court · May 5, 2026same court · fake citations + trialChen v. Goodmore Investments & TawaSupreme Court · May 1, 2026same court · fake citations + trialBen Cohen v. Ramat GanSupreme Court · Mar 22, 2026same court · fake citations + trialBen-Cohen v. Municipality of Ramat GanSupreme Court · Mar 22, 2026same court · fake citations + trial
Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.