Nº 5005798-22.2025.8.24.0005/SC
TJ San Catarina · Sep 23, 2025
Short answer. Status: Monetary Fine; amount: no amount stated. TJ San Catarina, decision date on record September 23, 2025. As of November 14, 2026. Court source · Methodology
- Jurisdiction
- International
- Court
- TJ San Catarina
- Record ID
- no-5005798-22-2025-8-24-0005-sc-2025-09-23
- Observed outcome
- Monetary Fine
- Known monetary consequence
- 1 SM (salário mínimo, one monthly minimum wage, Brazil; not converted)
Why this matter warrants attention
False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel attributed the sentence 'A aferição das condições econômico-financeiras da parte deve considerar o conjunto das suas obrigações...' to STJ, AR 4.914/DF, but the court found the number corresponded to a despacho and the quoted passage is not in the acórdão. Outcome: Monetary Fine.
The structured public record identifies fabricated quotes and other and records Monetary Fine. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fabricated quotes and other with Monetary Fine in TJ San Catarina. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fabricated Quotes
- Other
- Trial
- Monetary
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- No tool named in source
- Known monetary consequence
- 1 SM (salário mínimo, one monthly minimum wage, Brazil; not converted)
- Procedural posture
- Monetary Fine
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.