Nº 5025505-88.2025.8.24.0000/SC
TJ San Catarina · Apr 16, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- TJ San Catarina
- Record ID
- no-5025505-88-2025-8-24-0000-sc-2025-04-16
- Observed outcome
- Habeas Corpus request dismissed; Bar Referral
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Misrepresented: Case Law | Petition misstates the holding of RE 1.235.340 (STF), presenting the precedent as supporting the opposite thesis regarding execution after jury verdict. Outcome: Habeas Corpus request dismissed; Bar Referral. The court found the habeas corpus petition was drafted with clear use of artificial intelligence and contained multiple incorrect or fabricated citations. The petition mischaracterized an STF precedent (RE 1.235.340) and presented several STJ judgments with wrong origins and altered excerpts; one STJ number corresponded to a real process but its quoted passages were false. The tribunal concluded the AI-generated content was misleading and disrespectful, denied the relief, and ordered the file sent to the OAB Ethics Committee for evaluation of the lawyer's conduct.
The structured public record identifies fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority and records Habeas Corpus request dismissed; Bar Referral. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with Habeas Corpus request dismissed; Bar Referral in TJ San Catarina. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Bar Referral
- Trial
- Case Dismissed
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Habeas Corpus request dismissed; Bar Referral
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.