Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-025D528Generated August 16, 2026Evidence checked Aug 16, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Nº 5043726-22.2025.8.24.0000/SC

TJ San Catarina · Aug 12, 2025

Jurisdiction
international
Court
TJ San Catarina
Record ID
no-5043726-22-2025-8-24-0000-sc-2025-08-12
Observed outcome
Monetary Fine; Bar Referral
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

Fabricated: Case Law | Attorney credited Min. Paulo de Tarso Sanseverino with a formulation tied to REsp 1.792.145/SP; court determined the reference and quoted text do not exist for that matter in the repository. Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.

Why the decision-maker cared

The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Monetary Fine; Bar Referral. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.

Why it matters now

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in TJ San Catarina. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Fake Citations
  • Fabricated Quotes
  • Bar Referral
  • Trial
  • Monetary
  • Professional
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
AI (implied, unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Monetary Fine; Bar Referral
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
  2. Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
  3. Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.