Nonnie Berg v. United Airlines, Inc. (2)
D. Colorado · Jan 28, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. Colorado
- Record ID
- nonnie-berg-v-united-airlines-inc-2-2026-01-28
- Observed outcome
- Warning
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Court noted plaintiff's Motion to Compel contained citations to a seemingly nonexistent case referred to as "Hernandez" (pages 6 and 8 of the motion). Outcome: Warning. The court identified citations to seemingly nonexistent cases in the plaintiff's filings (e.g., "Hernandez" and "United States v. Miller"), noted prior warnings about AI-generated or unvetted citations, denied the motions, and warned it may recommend dismissal or similar sanctions if the conduct continues.
Fabricated: Case Law | Court noted plaintiff's Motion to Compel contained citations to a seemingly nonexistent case referred to as "Hernandez" (pages 6 and 8 of the motion). || Fabricated: Case Law | Court noted plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Order cited a seemingly nonexistent case "United States v. Miller" (page 4 of the motion).
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Colorado, with the listed outcome: Warning.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Contract
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Warning
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.