Which source supports this Nonnie Berg v. United Airlines, Inc. (2) summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesNonnie Berg v. United Airlines, Inc. (2)

Evidence review: primary document verified. The linked primary document was extracted and checked with page-level evidence locators.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passes the current publication gate; that is not a legal-editorial review or a guarantee that every field has been independently verified.

Corpus matter record

Nonnie Berg v. United Airlines, Inc. (2)

D. Colorado · Jan 28, 2026

CO / federal Editorial impact: low pro se fake citations contract trial Warning

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Court noted plaintiff's Motion to Compel contained citations to a seemingly nonexistent case referred to as "Hernandez" (pages 6 and 8 of the motion). Outcome: Warning. The court identified citations to seemingly nonexistent cases in the plaintiff's filings (e.g., "Hernandez" and "United States v. Miller"), noted prior warnings about AI-generated or unvetted citations, denied the motions, and warned it may recommend dismissal or similar sanctions if the conduct continues.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Court noted plaintiff's Motion to Compel contained citations to a seemingly nonexistent case referred to as "Hernandez" (pages 6 and 8 of the motion). || Fabricated: Case Law | Court noted plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Order cited a seemingly nonexistent case "United States v. Miller" (page 4 of the motion).
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Colorado, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Colorado, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

ColoradoSingle-state evidence scope

Explore COOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.

CourtD. Colorado

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateJan 28, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court noted plaintiff's Motion to Compel contained citations to a seemingly nonexistent case referred to as "Hernandez" (pages 6 and 8 of the motion).
Fabricated: Case Law | Court noted plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Order cited a seemingly nonexistent case "United States v. Miller" (page 4 of the motion).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Nonnie Berg v. United Airlines, Inc. (2)?: Fabricated: Case Law | Court noted plaintiff's Motion to Compel contained citations to a seemingly nonexistent case referred to as "Hernandez" (pages 6 and 8 of the motion). Outcome: Warning. The court identified citations to seemingly nonexistent cases in the plaintiff's filings (e.g., "Hernandez" and "United States v. Miller"), noted prior warnings about AI-generated or unvetted citations, denied the motions, and warned it may recommend dismissal or similar sanctions if the conduct continues.
Why does Nonnie Berg v. United Airlines, Inc. (2) matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Colorado, with the listed outcome: Warning.
What does the public record establish about Nonnie Berg v. United Airlines, Inc. (2)?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Nonnie Berg v. United Airlines, Inc. (2) summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Labonte v. Bokf, et al.D. Colorado · Feb 10, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Y.S. v. John Doe et al.D. Colorado · Nov 19, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Harris v. Take-Two Interactive SoftwareD. Colorado · May 6, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Hanson v. Nest Home Lending, LLC et al.D. Colorado · Nov 28, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Danielle Maloit v. Frank Daniel MaloitD. Colorado · Jul 29, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Y.S. v. John Doe, et al.D. Colorado · Jun 4, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Evidence-review statusprimary document verified

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Evidence review recorded Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Sep 10, 2026; latest tracked decision Sep 8, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open D. Colorado profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology