Nonnie Berg v. United Airlines, Inc. (3)
D. Colorado · Feb 6, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. Colorado
- Record ID
- nonnie-berg-v-united-airlines-inc-3-2026-02-06
- Observed outcome
- The court denied the plaintiff's motions and imposed a filing restriction requiring leave of court for any future filings until the court rules on the pending motion for summary judgment.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court imposed a filing restriction on the pro se plaintiff, Nonnie Berg, requiring her to obtain leave of court for future filings. This sanction was issued due to the plaintiff's persistent failure to follow procedural rules, including the submission of hallucinated case law and misrepresented legal authorities, despite repeated warnings regarding her misuse of generative AI.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Motion for Extension cited a nonexistent Ninth Circuit case titled 'Kelley v. United States' with a fabricated reporter citation. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Motion for Extension cited a nonexistent 10th Circuit opinion 'United States v. Miller' with a fabricated Westlaw cite and date. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Moore v. City of Del City' but misstated the reporter information and attributed an 'excusable neglect' holding that the Moore opinion did not address.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Colorado, with the listed outcome: Filing restriction.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Employment
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Explicitly Recorded
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The court issued a Minute Order denying the plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration and Motion for Extension of Time, while simultaneously imposing a filing restriction.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court noted the plaintiff's misuse of generative AI but did not identify a specific tool.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.