HomeCasesNonnie Berg v. United Airlines, Inc. (3)

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Nonnie Berg v. United Airlines, Inc. (3)

D. Colorado · Feb 6, 2026

CO / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authorityemployment

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Motion for Extension cited a nonexistent Ninth Circuit case titled 'Kelley v. United States' with a fabricated reporter citation. Outcome: Filing restriction.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Motion for Extension cited a nonexistent Ninth Circuit case titled 'Kelley v. United States' with a fabricated reporter citation. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Motion for Extension cited a nonexistent 10th Circuit opinion 'United States v. Miller' with a fabricated Westlaw cite and date. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Moore v. City of Del City' but misstated the reporter information and attributed an 'excusable neglect' holding that the Moore opinion did not address.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Colorado, with the listed outcome: Filing restriction.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Motion for Extension cited a nonexistent Ninth Circuit case titled 'Kelley v. United States' with a fabricated reporter citation. Outcome: Filing restriction.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Colorado, with the listed outcome: Filing restriction.

Record details

ColoradoSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Colorado

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateFeb 6, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeFiling restriction

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Filing restriction

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Motion for Extension cited a nonexistent Ninth Circuit case titled 'Kelley v. United States' with a fabricated reporter citation.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Motion for Extension cited a nonexistent 10th Circuit opinion 'United States v. Miller' with a fabricated Westlaw cite and date.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Moore v. City of Del City' but misstated the reporter information and attributed an 'excusable neglect' holding that the Moore opinion did not address.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Nonnie Berg v. United Airlines, Inc. (3)?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Motion for Extension cited a nonexistent Ninth Circuit case titled 'Kelley v. United States' with a fabricated reporter citation. Outcome: Filing restriction.
Why does Nonnie Berg v. United Airlines, Inc. (3) matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Colorado, with the listed outcome: Filing restriction.
What does the public record establish about Nonnie Berg v. United Airlines, Inc. (3)?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Nonnie Berg v. United Airlines, Inc. (3) summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Jamie Lee Saunders v. Albertsons/Safeway, LLCD. Colorado · Apr 16, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Hanson v. Nest Home Lending, LLC et al.D. Colorado · Nov 28, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Y.S. v. John Doe, et al.D. Colorado · Jun 4, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Labonte v. Bokf, et al.D. Colorado · Feb 10, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Y.S. v. John Doe et al.D. Colorado · Nov 19, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Matthew Lewis v. Eagle County GovernmentD. Colorado · Nov 14, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Motion for Extension cited a nonexistent Ninth Circuit case titled 'Kelley v. United States' with a fabricated reporter citation. Outcome: Filing restriction.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Colorado, with the listed outcome: Filing restriction.

Record details

ColoradoSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Colorado

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateFeb 6, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeFiling restriction

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Motion for Extension cited a nonexistent Ninth Circuit case titled 'Kelley v. United States' with a fabricated reporter citation.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Motion for Extension cited a nonexistent 10th Circuit opinion 'United States v. Miller' with a fabricated Westlaw cite and date.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Moore v. City of Del City' but misstated the reporter information and attributed an 'excusable neglect' holding that the Moore opinion did not address.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Nonnie Berg v. United Airlines, Inc. (3)?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Motion for Extension cited a nonexistent Ninth Circuit case titled 'Kelley v. United States' with a fabricated reporter citation. Outcome: Filing restriction.

Why does Nonnie Berg v. United Airlines, Inc. (3) matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Colorado, with the listed outcome: Filing restriction.

What does the public record establish about Nonnie Berg v. United Airlines, Inc. (3)?

Which source supports this Nonnie Berg v. United Airlines, Inc. (3) summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.