Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-0RYRNUOGenerated September 2, 2026Evidence checked Sep 2, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Perez v. Schaal, et al.

Super. Ct., Sacramento County (Cal.) · Aug 20, 2026

Jurisdiction
state
Court
Super. Ct., Sacramento County (Cal.)
Record ID
perez-v-schaal-et-al-2026-08-20
Observed outcome
Court warned the pro se plaintiff to verify all citations and quotations, declined to impose sanctions at this time.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed the sentence "The filing of an answer … effected a waiver of the right to demur." to Adorh (Adohr) Milk Farms, Inc. v. Love (255 Cal.App.2d 366), but the court could not find that language in that opinion or any reported case and noted the quotation may be AI-generated. Outcome: Court warned the pro se plaintiff to verify all citations and quotations, declined to impose sanctions at this time.. The pro se plaintiff quoted a passage attributed to Adorh (Adohr) Milk Farms, Inc. v. Love (255 Cal.App.2d 366) that the court could not find in that opinion or any other reported case. The court identified the likely AI origin of the fabricated quotation, cited case law warning that relying on fabricated authority is sanctionable, and cautioned the plaintiff to verify citations. The court declined to impose sanctions at this time but warned future fabricated citations could result in sanctions.

Why the decision-maker cared

The structured public record identifies pro se and fabricated quotes and records Court warned the pro se plaintiff to verify all citations and quotations, declined to impose sanctions at this time.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.

Why it matters now

This matter connects pro se and fabricated quotes with Court warned the pro se plaintiff to verify all citations and quotations, declined to impose sanctions at this time. in Super. Ct., Sacramento County (Cal.). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fabricated Quotes
  • Trial
  • None Adjudicated
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
AI (implied, unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Court warned the pro se plaintiff to verify all citations and quotations, declined to impose sanctions at this time.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
  2. Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.