Perez v. Schaal, et al.
Super. Ct., Sacramento County (Cal.) · Aug 20, 2026
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed the sentence "The filing of an answer … effected a waiver of the right to demur." to Adorh (Adohr) Milk Farms, Inc. v. Love (255 Cal.App.2d 366), but the court could not find that language in that opinion or any reported case and noted the quotation may be AI-generated. Outcome: Court warned the pro se plaintiff to verify all citations and quotations, declined to impose sanctions at this time.. The pro se plaintiff quoted a passage attributed to Adorh (Adohr) Milk Farms, Inc. v. Love (255 Cal.App.2d 366) that the court could not find in that opinion or any other reported case. The court identified the likely AI origin of the fabricated quotation, cited case law warning that relying on fabricated authority is sanctionable, and cautioned the plaintiff to verify citations. The court declined to impose sanctions at this time but warned future fabricated citations could result in sanctions.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies pro se and fabricated quotes and records Court warned the pro se plaintiff to verify all citations and quotations, declined to impose sanctions at this time.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fabricated quotes with Court warned the pro se plaintiff to verify all citations and quotations, declined to impose sanctions at this time. in Super. Ct., Sacramento County (Cal.). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed the sentence "The filing of an answer … effected a waiver of the right to demur." to Adorh (Adohr) Milk Farms, Inc. v. Love (255 Cal.App.2d 366), but the court could not find that language in that opinion or any reported case and noted the quotation may be AI-generated. Outcome: Court warned the pro se plaintiff to verify all citations and quotations, declined to impose sanctions at this time.. The pro se plaintiff quoted a passage attributed to Adorh (Adohr) Milk Farms, Inc. v. Love (255 Cal.App.2d 366) that the court could not find in that opinion or any other reported case. The court identified the likely AI origin of the fabricated quotation, cited case law warning that relying on fabricated authority is sanctionable, and cautioned the plaintiff to verify citations. The court declined to impose sanctions at this time but warned future fabricated citations could result in sanctions.
This matter connects pro se and fabricated quotes with Court warned the pro se plaintiff to verify all citations and quotations, declined to impose sanctions at this time. in Super. Ct., Sacramento County (Cal.). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Court warned the pro se plaintiff to verify all citations and quotations, declined to impose sanctions at this time.
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed the sentence "The filing of an answer … effected a waiver of the right to demur." to Adorh (Adohr) Milk Farms, Inc. v. Love (255 Cal.App.2d 366), but the court could not find that language in that opinion or any reported case and noted the quotation may be AI-generated.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Perez v. Schaal, et al.?
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed the sentence "The filing of an answer … effected a waiver of the right to demur." to Adorh (Adohr) Milk Farms, Inc. v. Love (255 Cal.App.2d 366), but the court could not find that language in that opinion or any reported case and noted the quotation may be AI-generated. Outcome: Court warned the pro se plaintiff to verify all citations and quotations, declined to impose sanctions at this time.. The pro se plaintiff quoted a passage attributed to Adorh (Adohr) Milk Farms, Inc. v. Love (255 Cal.App.2d 366) that the court could not find in that opinion or any other reported case. The court identified the likely AI origin of the fabricated quotation, cited case law warning that relying on fabricated authority is sanctionable, and cautioned the plaintiff to verify citations. The court declined to impose sanctions at this time but warned future fabricated citations could result in sanctions.
- Why does Perez v. Schaal, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fabricated quotes with Court warned the pro se plaintiff to verify all citations and quotations, declined to impose sanctions at this time. in Super. Ct., Sacramento County (Cal.). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Perez v. Schaal, et al.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Perez v. Schaal, et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.