Preston House v. TH Foods, Inc.
D. Nevada · Dec 11, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. Nevada
- Record ID
- preston-house-v-th-foods-inc-2025-12-11
- Observed outcome
- The court overruled the plaintiff's objections and issued a formal admonishment regarding the use of hallucinated case law, with a warning of future sanctions.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court admonished the pro se plaintiff for submitting briefs containing nonexistent and hallucinated case citations. The district judge overruled the plaintiff's objection to this admonition, confirming the citations were fabricated or misattributed, and explicitly warned that future failures to verify legal authority would result in sanctions.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited real cases but attributed them to the wrong courts or to propositions those cases do not support. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on multiple nonexistent case citations identified in TH Foods' filing; the court confirmed the cited cases do not exist.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Admonishment.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Employment
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Explicitly Recorded
- Recorded tool
- AI (unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Order overruling the plaintiff's objection to a magistrate judge's discovery order, denying a motion to stay, and denying summary judgment motions without prejudice.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court identified the citations as generated by AI.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.