HomeCasesJames Fahey v. Wally’s Las Vegas, LLC, et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

James Fahey v. Wally’s Las Vegas, LLC, et al.

D. Nevada · Dec 10, 2025

NV / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authority

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Hagen v. Williams, No. 2:18-cv-00425, 2020 WL 1272618,' but the court found the case name, docket number, and database identifier do not correspond and the citation appears nonexistent. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Hagen v. Williams, No. 2:18-cv-00425, 2020 WL 1272618,' but the court found the case name, docket number, and database identifier do not correspond and the citation appears nonexistent. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'U.S. ex rel. Poehling v. UnitedHealth Grp., Inc., 2018 WL 845548, at *5,' but the court concluded the case name exists while the database identifier/electronic report number provided does not correspond and the cited order does not support Plaintiff's parenthetical explanation. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff cited language to 'Solis v. Zenith Capital, LLC, No. C 08-4854 PJH, 2009 WL 1324051, at *3,' but the court found the quoted material does not appear in the order cited and the order does not address the issue Plaintiff attributed to it.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

NevadaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Nevada

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateDec 10, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Hagen v. Williams, No. 2:18-cv-00425, 2020 WL 1272618,' but the court found the case name, docket number, and database identifier do not correspond and the citation appears nonexistent.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'U.S. ex rel. Poehling v. UnitedHealth Grp., Inc., 2018 WL 845548, at *5,' but the court concluded the case name exists while the database identifier/electronic report number provided does not correspond and the cited order does not support Plaintiff's parenthetical explanation.
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff cited language to 'Solis v. Zenith Capital, LLC, No. C 08-4854 PJH, 2009 WL 1324051, at *3,' but the court found the quoted material does not appear in the order cited and the order does not address the issue Plaintiff attributed to it.

Questions this record answers

What happened in James Fahey v. Wally’s Las Vegas, LLC, et al.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Hagen v. Williams, No. 2:18-cv-00425, 2020 WL 1272618,' but the court found the case name, docket number, and database identifier do not correspond and the citation appears nonexistent. Outcome: Warning.
Why does James Fahey v. Wally’s Las Vegas, LLC, et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning.
What does the public record establish about James Fahey v. Wally’s Las Vegas, LLC, et al.?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this James Fahey v. Wally’s Las Vegas, LLC, et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Preston House v. TH Foods, Inc.D. Nevada · Jun 18, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Seeto v. KendallD. Nevada · May 5, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Edward C. Allen v. Western Governors University, et al.D. Nevada · Mar 31, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Preston House v. TH Foods, Inc.D. Nevada · Dec 11, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Jackson v. United States DHSD. Nevada · Oct 1, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Lori Chavez-DeRemer v. NAB, LLC, Asia Trinh, and Nicole BrownD. Nevada · Aug 11, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

NevadaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Nevada

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateDec 10, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'U.S. ex rel. Poehling v. UnitedHealth Grp., Inc., 2018 WL 845548, at *5,' but the court concluded the case name exists while the database identifier/electronic report number provided does not correspond and the cited order does not support Plaintiff's parenthetical explanation.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff cited language to 'Solis v. Zenith Capital, LLC, No. C 08-4854 PJH, 2009 WL 1324051, at *3,' but the court found the quoted material does not appear in the order cited and the order does not address the issue Plaintiff attributed to it.

Questions this record answers

What happened in James Fahey v. Wally’s Las Vegas, LLC, et al.?

Why does James Fahey v. Wally’s Las Vegas, LLC, et al. matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning.

What does the public record establish about James Fahey v. Wally’s Las Vegas, LLC, et al.?

Which source supports this James Fahey v. Wally’s Las Vegas, LLC, et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.