Régie du bâtiment du Québec c. 9308-2469 Québec inc.
Régie du bâtiment du Québec · Sep 11, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Régie du bâtiment du Québec
- Record ID
- régie-du-bâtiment-du-québec-c-9308-2469-québec-inc-2025-09-11
- Observed outcome
- The Bureau disregarded the AI-generated arguments and ultimately cancelled the respondents' construction contractor licenses.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The Régie du bâtiment du Québec disregarded a 191-page written submission filed by the respondents after discovering that the majority of the case law and legal norms cited therein were fabricated and did not exist.
The Bureau determined that the cited authorities did not exist after a summary review of the 191-page document, leading the decision-maker to reject the arguments supported by those fabrications.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving ChatGPT with Disregarded AI-generated arguments in Régie du bâtiment du Québec, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Administrative
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- ChatGPT
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Administrative disciplinary proceeding before the Bureau des régisseurs of the Régie du bâtiment du Québec resulting in a final decision on September 11, 2025.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Apply the same source-checking controls to ChatGPT output as to any other research input.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.