HomeCasesRégie du bâtiment du Québec c. 9308-2469 Québec inc.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Régie du bâtiment du Québec c. 9308-2469 Québec inc.

Régie du bâtiment du Québec · Sep 11, 2025

CanadaEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsadministrativetrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | A 191‑page written submission filed by the respondents cited numerous judgments that the Bureau could not locate and concluded many authorities did not exist; the Court rejected reliance on them. Outcome: Disregarded AI-generated arguments.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Disregarded AI-generated arguments; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving ChatGPT with Disregarded AI-generated arguments in Régie du bâtiment du Québec, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving ChatGPT with Disregarded AI-generated arguments in Régie du bâtiment du Québec, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtRégie du bâtiment du Québec

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateSep 11, 2025

AI toolChatGPT

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeDisregarded AI-generated arguments

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Disregarded AI-generated arguments

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | A 191‑page written submission filed by the respondents cited numerous judgments that the Bureau could not locate and concluded many authorities did not exist; the Court rejected reliance on them.
Fabricated: Legal Norm | A 191‑page written submission filed by the respondents cited numerous norms that the Bureau could not locate and concluded many authorities did not exist; the Court rejected reliance on them.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Régie du bâtiment du Québec c. 9308-2469 Québec inc.?: Fabricated: Case Law | A 191‑page written submission filed by the respondents cited numerous judgments that the Bureau could not locate and concluded many authorities did not exist; the Court rejected reliance on them. Outcome: Disregarded AI-generated arguments.
Why does Régie du bâtiment du Québec c. 9308-2469 Québec inc. matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving ChatGPT with Disregarded AI-generated arguments in Régie du bâtiment du Québec, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Régie du bâtiment du Québec c. 9308-2469 Québec inc.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Régie du bâtiment du Québec c. 9308-2469 Québec inc. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Boonstra v Edmonton (City)Court of King’s Bench of Alberta · Apr 21, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: ChatGPT Folarin v. The Immigration Services CommissionnerFirst-tier Tribunal · Jan 29, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: ChatGPT Dudak (Re)SafeRoads Alberta · Jan 2, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: ChatGPT Maxwell v. WestJet Airlines Ltd.Civil Resolution Tribunal · Aug 15, 2025pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: ChatGPT Moradi v. British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal)Supreme Court of British Columbia · Jul 18, 2025pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: ChatGPT LaPointe v. Chief Animal Welfare InspectorOntario's Animal Care Review Board · Jun 30, 2025pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: ChatGPT

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Legal Norm | A 191‑page written submission filed by the respondents cited numerous norms that the Bureau could not locate and concluded many authorities did not exist; the Court rejected reliance on them.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Régie du bâtiment du Québec c. 9308-2469 Québec inc.?

Why does Régie du bâtiment du Québec c. 9308-2469 Québec inc. matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Régie du bâtiment du Québec c. 9308-2469 Québec inc.?

Which source supports this Régie du bâtiment du Québec c. 9308-2469 Québec inc. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.