Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-05COQD6Generated September 10, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Robbin Y. Miller v. Andrew Stuart

5th Cir. CA · Nov 13, 2025

Jurisdiction
federal
Court
5th Cir. CA
Record ID
robbin-y-miller-v-andrew-stuart-2025-11-13
Observed outcome
The court affirmed the lower court's dismissal and issued a formal warning regarding the use of fabricated citations.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The Fifth Circuit issued a formal warning to a pro se litigant for citing nonexistent cases and misrepresenting legal authorities in her appellate brief. The court affirmed the underlying dismissal of her claims and cautioned that continued use of fabricated citations would lead to future sanctions.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Succession of Faget' as '838 So.2d 86 (La. App. 5 Cir. 2003)', but that citation does not appear and does not support the proposition she attributed to it; court noted the inaccuracy.

Why it matters now

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in 5th Cir. CA, with the listed outcome: Warning.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Contract
  • Appellate
  • Warning
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
AI (implied, unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Appellate review of a district court's Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.