Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 2, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 1, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesBourrage v. Sollie
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Bourrage v. Sollie

5th Cir. CA · Sep 24, 2026

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | Bourrage quoted language as coming from Walker v. Epps, but the quoted language does not appear in that opinion. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in 5th Cir. CA. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

False Quotes: Case Law | Bourrage quoted language as coming from Walker v. Epps, but the quoted language does not appear in that opinion. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in 5th Cir. CA. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

Court5th Cir. CA
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit5th Circuit
DateSep 24, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. False Quotes: Case Law | Bourrage quoted language as coming from Walker v. Epps, but the quoted language does not appear in that opinion.
  2. Misrepresented: Case Law | Bourrage cited Utterback v. United States as a 2025 Fifth Circuit decision, but no such Fifth Circuit decision exists; the citation corresponds to Fields v. Liberty Healthcare Corp., a 2025 Seventh Circuit case.
  3. Fabricated: Case Law | Bourrage cited Humphries v. Mississippi Department of Transportation, which the Fifth Circuit could not locate and concluded did not exist.
  4. Fabricated: Case Law | Bourrage cited State v. Murphy, which the Fifth Circuit could not locate and concluded did not exist.
  5. Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Bourrage cited Policy 6517X337 and a Detail Loss Report, but neither document appeared in the record and neither was relevant to the case; the court noted that the documents existed online.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Bourrage v. Sollie?
False Quotes: Case Law | Bourrage quoted language as coming from Walker v. Epps, but the quoted language does not appear in that opinion. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Bourrage v. Sollie matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in 5th Cir. CA. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Bourrage v. Sollie?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Bourrage v. Sollie summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.