Robbin Y. Miller v. Andrew Stuart
5th Cir. CA · Nov 13, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- 5th Cir. CA
- Record ID
- robbin-y-miller-v-andrew-stuart-2025-11-13
- Observed outcome
- The court affirmed the lower court's dismissal and issued a formal warning regarding the use of fabricated citations.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The Fifth Circuit issued a formal warning to a pro se litigant for citing nonexistent cases and misrepresenting legal authorities in her appellate brief. The court affirmed the underlying dismissal of her claims and cautioned that continued use of fabricated citations would lead to future sanctions.
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Succession of Faget' as '838 So.2d 86 (La. App. 5 Cir. 2003)', but that citation does not appear and does not support the proposition she attributed to it; court noted the inaccuracy.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in 5th Cir. CA, with the listed outcome: Warning.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Contract
- Appellate
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- No tool named in source
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Appellate review of a district court's Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.