Robby Mendez v. City of Topeka, et al.
D. Kansas · Jan 16, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. Kansas
- Record ID
- robby-mendez-v-city-of-topeka-et-al-2026-01-16
- Observed outcome
- Warning
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated reference to Smith v. West Lake Enterprises, 374 F. Supp. 2d 1094 (D. Kan. 2005) Outcome: Warning. While the court did not ascertained whether the plaintiff's brief contained any hallucination, Pelaikan identified at least two, as well as several misrepresentations: see the report here.
Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated reference to Smith v. West Lake Enterprises, 374 F. Supp. 2d 1094 (D. Kan. 2005)
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Kansas, with the listed outcome: Warning.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Employment
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Warning
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.