AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 10, 2026 · Latest decision Sep 8, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesRobby Mendez v. City of Topeka, et al.
Evidence review: primary document verified. The linked primary document was extracted and checked with page-level evidence locators.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passes the current publication gate; that is not a legal-editorial review or a guarantee that every field has been independently verified.
Corpus matter record

Robby Mendez v. City of Topeka, et al.

D. Kansas · Jan 16, 2026

KS / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsemploymenttrialWarning
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated reference to Smith v. West Lake Enterprises, 374 F. Supp. 2d 1094 (D. Kan. 2005) Outcome: Warning. While the court did not ascertained whether the plaintiff's brief contained any hallucination, Pelaikan identified at least two, as well as several misrepresentations: see the report here.

Why the court cared
Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated reference to Smith v. West Lake Enterprises, 374 F. Supp. 2d 1094 (D. Kan. 2005)
Why it matters now
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Kansas, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated reference to Smith v. West Lake Enterprises, 374 F. Supp. 2d 1094 (D. Kan. 2005) Outcome: Warning. While the court did not ascertained whether the plaintiff's brief contained any hallucination, Pelaikan identified at least two, as well as several misrepresentations: see the report here.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Kansas, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

KansasSingle-state evidence scope
Explore KSOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtD. Kansas
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit10th Circuit
DateJan 16, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated reference to Smith v. West Lake Enterprises, 374 F. Supp. 2d 1094 (D. Kan. 2005)

Questions this record answers

What happened in Robby Mendez v. City of Topeka, et al.?
Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated reference to Smith v. West Lake Enterprises, 374 F. Supp. 2d 1094 (D. Kan. 2005) Outcome: Warning. While the court did not ascertained whether the plaintiff's brief contained any hallucination, Pelaikan identified at least two, as well as several misrepresentations: see the report here.
Why does Robby Mendez v. City of Topeka, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Kansas, with the listed outcome: Warning.
What does the public record establish about Robby Mendez v. City of Topeka, et al.?
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Robby Mendez v. City of Topeka, et al. summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Ford v. Sherwin-WilliamsD. Kansas · Mar 31, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsZesiger v. Kansas et al.D. Kansas · Mar 17, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsRoosevelt Hunt, Jr. v. True Sky Federal Credit UnionD. Kansas · Feb 25, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsMcLain v. Board of County Commissioners of Sedgwick County, Kansas, et al.D. Kansas · Dec 11, 2025same court · pro se + fake citationsBorsody v. Frontier Heritage CommunitiesD. Kansas · Nov 4, 2025same court · pro se + fake citationsDouglas Stuart Queen v. Kansas City et al.D. Kansas · Oct 7, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations