Roosevelt Hunt, Jr. v. True Sky Federal Credit Union
D. Kansas · Feb 25, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. Kansas
- Record ID
- roosevelt-hunt-jr-v-true-sky-federal-credit-union-2026-02-25
- Observed outcome
- The court issued a warning to the plaintiff regarding the use of AI and the requirement to verify citations, noting that future violations could lead to sanctions.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court issued a warning to a pro se litigant for citing a non-existent case, noting the potential for sanctions under Standing Order 26-01 if the litigant fails to verify the accuracy of future filings drafted or assisted by AI tools.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Howard v. CitiMortgage, Inc., 2019 WL 1401348 (D. Kan. Mar. 28, 2019)', which the court found does not exist in Westlaw and for which no case number was provided.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Kansas, with the listed outcome: Warning.
Failure modes and consequences
- Hallucinated_case_law
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Contract
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The court granted in part and took under advisement in part the defendant's motion to dismiss, while simultaneously issuing a warning regarding the plaintiff's citation of non-existent case law.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court referenced its standing order on AI usage in response to the plaintiff's citation of a non-existent case.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.