SAP A 1558/2025 - ECLI:ES:APA:2025:1558
AP Alicante · Oct 8, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- AP Alicante
- Record ID
- sap-a-15582025-ecliesapa20251558-2025-10-08
- Observed outcome
- The appeal was partially allowed on the merits, and the court ordered a referral of the lawyer to the Alicante Bar Association.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court referred the lawyer to the Alicante Bar Association for disciplinary review after finding that the appellant's brief contained fabricated quotations attributed to a Supreme Court decision. The court explicitly framed the error as either an AI hallucination or an intentional act of deception.
The court found that the alleged quotation could not support the appeal because it was absent from the cited Supreme Court decision. It then referred the matter to the bar while deciding the insolvency appeal on its statutory merits.
The ruling records a court’s explicit alternative framing—AI hallucination or intent to deceive—and makes the evidentiary boundary unusually clear.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fabricated Quotes
- Bar Referral
- Bankruptcy
- Trial
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Appellate review of a commercial court judgment regarding insolvency and debt discharge.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court explicitly mentions AI hallucinations as a potential cause.
The court did not determine which of its two alternatives—AI hallucination or deliberate deception—was true. The source confirms the quotation mismatch and the referral, not a final disciplinary outcome.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Compare every quoted passage against the cited judgment, not only its citation label.
- Treat a bar referral as a referral, not a final professional sanction.
- Keep the court’s alternative wording intact rather than asserting a confirmed AI cause.