Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
SAP A 1558/2025 - ECLI:ES:APA:2025:1558
AP Alicante · Oct 8, 2025
SpainEditorial impact: highfabricated quotesbar referralbankruptcytrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
In SAP A 1558/2025, the Eighth Section of the Alicante Provincial Court partially allowed an appeal concerning the extent of debt discharge in insolvency proceedings. Before reaching the merits, the court examined a passage in the appeal that attributed three quoted paragraphs to Spanish Supreme Court judgment STS 450/2025. The court stated that those paragraphs do not appear in that judgment and that the decision addressed the Insolvency Act in its original wording. It said the submission was either the product of artificial-intelligence hallucinations or an intention to deceive that exceeded the good-faith obligations of litigation.…
- Why the court cared
- The court found that the alleged quotation could not support the appeal because it was absent from the cited Supreme Court decision. It then referred the matter to the bar while deciding the insolvency appeal on its statutory merits.
- Why it matters now
- The ruling records a court’s explicit alternative framing—AI hallucination or intent to deceive—and makes the evidentiary boundary unusually clear.
Why this matter is tracked
In SAP A 1558/2025, the Eighth Section of the Alicante Provincial Court partially allowed an appeal concerning the extent of debt discharge in insolvency proceedings. Before reaching the merits, the court examined a passage in the appeal that attributed three quoted paragraphs to Spanish Supreme Court judgment STS 450/2025. The court stated that those paragraphs do not appear in that judgment and that the decision addressed the Insolvency Act in its original wording. It said the submission was either the product of artificial-intelligence hallucinations or an intention to deceive that exceeded the good-faith obligations of litigation. The court ordered that a copy of its ruling be sent to the Alicante Bar Association for any disciplinary action it considered appropriate. The appeal was partly allowed on the debt-discharge issue, without costs on appeal, while the referral followed the false quotation concern.
Operational lesson
Spanish appellate courts are now referring lawyers to the Colegio for fabricated quotes; always pull the original STS text.
Record details
CourtAP Alicante
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateOct 8, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeBar referral
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Bar referral
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant's brief quoted paragraphs allegedly from STS 450/2025 that do not appear in that decision
Questions this record answers
- What happened in SAP A 1558/2025 - ECLI:ES:APA:2025:1558?
- In SAP A 1558/2025, the Eighth Section of the Alicante Provincial Court partially allowed an appeal concerning the extent of debt discharge in insolvency proceedings. Before reaching the merits, the court examined a passage in the appeal that attributed three quoted paragraphs to Spanish Supreme Court judgment STS 450/2025. The court stated that those paragraphs do not appear in that judgment and that the decision addressed the Insolvency Act in its original wording. It said the submission was either the product of artificial-intelligence hallucinations or an intention to deceive that exceeded the good-faith obligations of litigation.…
- Why does SAP A 1558/2025 - ECLI:ES:APA:2025:1558 matter for legal AI risk?
- The ruling records a court’s explicit alternative framing—AI hallucination or intent to deceive—and makes the evidentiary boundary unusually clear.
- What does the public record establish about SAP A 1558/2025 - ECLI:ES:APA:2025:1558?
- The court did not determine which of its two alternatives—AI hallucination or deliberate deception—was true. The source confirms the quotation mismatch and the referral, not a final disciplinary outcome.
- Which source supports this SAP A 1558/2025 - ECLI:ES:APA:2025:1558 summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.