Saregama India Ltd. v. B.A., et al.
S.D. New York · Dec 3, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- S.D. New York
- Record ID
- saregama-india-ltd-v-b-a-et-al-2025-12-03
- Observed outcome
- None Adjudicated
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Reply cited 'Khurana v. State of N.Y., No. 16-cv ... 2019 WL 1430202' — Court observed this cited case does not exist.
Fabricated: Case Law | Reply cited 'Khurana v. State of N.Y., No. 16-cv ... 2019 WL 1430202' — Court observed this cited case does not exist. || False Quotes: Case Law | Reply attributed quotations to F.I. duPont, Glore Forgan & Co. v. Chen that the Court found not to appear in that opinion (false quotation). || Misrepresented: Case Law | Reply cited Bossuk v. Steinberg and S.E.C. v. McNulty for propositions the Court found they do not support (misrepresentation of precedent). || Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Reply misquoted statutes including CPLR § 2103(f)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 69(a)(1); Court noted statutory misquotations.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. New York, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Contract
- Trial
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- No tool named in source
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
websitedc.s3.amazonaws.com
Secondary or other linked source. The recorded link is not classified as an official court source or docket mirror.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Source Unavailable (medium confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.