Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Tameer Peak v. Onika Tanya Maraj-Petty, et al.
S.D. New York · Nov 26, 2025
NY / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authority
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed the quotation "[a] default is willful where the conduct of counsel or the litigant was egregious and was not satisfactorily explained" to Action S.A. v. Marc Rich & Co.; the court found that quotation does not appear in that opinion. Outcome: Plaintiff cautioned to disclose and verify any AI use.
- Why the court cared
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed the quotation "[a] default is willful where the conduct of counsel or the litigant was egregious and was not satisfactorily explained" to Action S.A. v. Marc Rich & Co.; the court found that quotation does not appear in that opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff cited S.E.C. v. McNulty for the proposition that "waiting to retain counsel does not constitute good cause," but the court found no such quote in McNulty and noted the case addresses a different procedural posture. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff claimed Shady Records held that reputational harm is a form of prejudice; the court found Shady Records said nothing of reputational harm and was about different relief. || Fabricated: Case Law | The court observed that multiple case quotations in plaintiff's Nov. 12, 2025 opposition cannot be found in the cited cases and described them as likely AI 'hallucinated' citations.
- Why it matters now
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. New York, with the listed outcome: Plaintiff cautioned to disclose and verify any AI use.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed the quotation "[a] default is willful where the conduct of counsel or the litigant was egregious and was not satisfactorily explained" to Action S.A. v. Marc Rich & Co.; the court found that quotation does not appear in that opinion. Outcome: Plaintiff cautioned to disclose and verify any AI use.
Operational lesson
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. New York, with the listed outcome: Plaintiff cautioned to disclose and verify any AI use.
Record details
New YorkSingle-state evidence scope
CourtS.D. New York
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit2nd Circuit
DateNov 26, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomePlaintiff cautioned to disclose and verify any AI use
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Plaintiff cautioned to disclose and verify any AI use
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed the quotation "[a] default is willful where the conduct of counsel or the litigant was egregious and was not satisfactorily explained" to Action S.A. v. Marc Rich & Co.; the court found that quotation does not appear in that opinion.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff cited S.E.C. v. McNulty for the proposition that "waiting to retain counsel does not constitute good cause," but the court found no such quote in McNulty and noted the case addresses a different procedural posture.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff claimed Shady Records held that reputational harm is a form of prejudice; the court found Shady Records said nothing of reputational harm and was about different relief.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The court observed that multiple case quotations in plaintiff's Nov. 12, 2025 opposition cannot be found in the cited cases and described them as likely AI 'hallucinated' citations.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Tameer Peak v. Onika Tanya Maraj-Petty, et al.?
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed the quotation "[a] default is willful where the conduct of counsel or the litigant was egregious and was not satisfactorily explained" to Action S.A. v. Marc Rich & Co.; the court found that quotation does not appear in that opinion. Outcome: Plaintiff cautioned to disclose and verify any AI use.
- Why does Tameer Peak v. Onika Tanya Maraj-Petty, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. New York, with the listed outcome: Plaintiff cautioned to disclose and verify any AI use.
- What does the public record establish about Tameer Peak v. Onika Tanya Maraj-Petty, et al.?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Tameer Peak v. Onika Tanya Maraj-Petty, et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.