Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-1U6O42WGenerated September 11, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

SARL Galvalux c. Urssaf

CA Douai · Jul 9, 2026

Jurisdiction
international
Court
CA Douai
Record ID
sarl-galvalux-c-urssaf-2026-07-09
Observed outcome
Evidence rejected
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Prévisionnel d'activité (business plan) produced by the appellant was established via a site using AI on the basis of invented data; court found it not serious and unreliable. Outcome: Evidence rejected. The appellant produced a business plan / prévisionnel that the liquidator and court found was generated via a website using artificial intelligence based on data provided by the manager and 'invented of all pieces'. The court held the AI-generated forecasts were not supported by any accounting records, were not reliable or probative, and therefore could not establish realistic prospects of redressement. As a result the prévisionnel was discounted in the court's assessment and the liquidation judgment was confirmed.

Why the decision-maker cared

The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Evidence rejected. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.

Why it matters now

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Evidence rejected in CA Douai. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Appellate
  • None Adjudicated
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
AI (implied, unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Evidence rejected
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
  2. Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.