AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Aug 17, 2026 · Latest decision Aug 13, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesSARL Galvalux c. Urssaf
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

SARL Galvalux c. Urssaf

CA Douai · Jul 9, 2026

FranceEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsappellateNone Adjudicated
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Prévisionnel d'activité (business plan) produced by the appellant was established via a site using AI on the basis of invented data; court found it not serious and unreliable. Outcome: Evidence rejected. The appellant produced a business plan / prévisionnel that the liquidator and court found was generated via a website using artificial intelligence based on data provided by the manager and 'invented of all pieces'. The court held the AI-generated forecasts were not supported by any accounting records, were not reliable or probative, and therefore could not establish realistic prospects of redressement. As a result the prévisionnel was discounted in the court's assessment and the liquidation judgment was confirmed.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Evidence rejected. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Evidence rejected in CA Douai. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Prévisionnel d'activité (business plan) produced by the appellant was established via a site using AI on the basis of invented data; court found it not serious and unreliable. Outcome: Evidence rejected. The appellant produced a business plan / prévisionnel that the liquidator and court found was generated via a website using artificial intelligence based on data provided by the manager and 'invented of all pieces'. The court held the AI-generated forecasts were not supported by any accounting records, were not reliable or probative, and therefore could not establish realistic prospects of redressement. As a result the prévisionnel was discounted in the court's assessment and the liquidation judgment was confirmed.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Evidence rejected in CA Douai. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtCA Douai
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateJul 9, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeEvidence rejected
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Evidence rejected

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Prévisionnel d'activité (business plan) produced by the appellant was established via a site using AI on the basis of invented data; court found it not serious and unreliable.

Questions this record answers

What happened in SARL Galvalux c. Urssaf?
Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Prévisionnel d'activité (business plan) produced by the appellant was established via a site using AI on the basis of invented data; court found it not serious and unreliable. Outcome: Evidence rejected. The appellant produced a business plan / prévisionnel that the liquidator and court found was generated via a website using artificial intelligence based on data provided by the manager and 'invented of all pieces'. The court held the AI-generated forecasts were not supported by any accounting records, were not reliable or probative, and therefore could not establish realistic prospects of redressement. As a result the prévisionnel was discounted in the court's assessment and the liquidation judgment was confirmed.
Why does SARL Galvalux c. Urssaf matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Evidence rejected in CA Douai. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about SARL Galvalux c. Urssaf?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this SARL Galvalux c. Urssaf summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

WRI Summit REIT LP v. KuerschnerCA Arizona (1d) · Aug 10, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Whitehead v. MooreCA Missouri · Aug 4, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)First Community Credit Union v. Ashley SmithCA Wisconsin · Jul 30, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Harding Place Multifamily Partners v. Samuel RobinsonCA Tennessee · Jul 29, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Shantell Robinson v. Oglala Sioux Tribe et al.CA 10th Cir. · Jul 29, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Ally Bank v. Serge N. NgouambeCA Minnesota · Jul 27, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)