Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 27, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 24, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It remains available for research but is excluded from search indexing until its documented evidence gaps are resolved.
SARL Galvalux c. Urssaf
CA Douai · Jul 9, 2026
FranceEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsappellate
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Prévisionnel d'activité (business plan) produced by the appellant was established via a site using AI on the basis of invented data; court found it not serious and unreliable. Outcome: Evidence rejected. The appellant produced a business plan / prévisionnel that the liquidator and court found was generated via a website using artificial intelligence based on data provided by the manager and 'invented of all pieces'. The court held the AI-generated forecasts were not supported by any accounting records, were not reliable or probative, and therefore could not establish realistic prospects of redressement. As a result the prévisionnel was discounted in the court's assessment and the liquidation judgment was confirmed.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Evidence rejected. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Evidence rejected in CA Douai. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Prévisionnel d'activité (business plan) produced by the appellant was established via a site using AI on the basis of invented data; court found it not serious and unreliable. Outcome: Evidence rejected. The appellant produced a business plan / prévisionnel that the liquidator and court found was generated via a website using artificial intelligence based on data provided by the manager and 'invented of all pieces'. The court held the AI-generated forecasts were not supported by any accounting records, were not reliable or probative, and therefore could not establish realistic prospects of redressement. As a result the prévisionnel was discounted in the court's assessment and the liquidation judgment was confirmed.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Evidence rejected in CA Douai. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
CourtCA Douai
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateJul 9, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeEvidence rejected
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Evidence rejected
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Prévisionnel d'activité (business plan) produced by the appellant was established via a site using AI on the basis of invented data; court found it not serious and unreliable.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in SARL Galvalux c. Urssaf?
- Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Prévisionnel d'activité (business plan) produced by the appellant was established via a site using AI on the basis of invented data; court found it not serious and unreliable. Outcome: Evidence rejected. The appellant produced a business plan / prévisionnel that the liquidator and court found was generated via a website using artificial intelligence based on data provided by the manager and 'invented of all pieces'. The court held the AI-generated forecasts were not supported by any accounting records, were not reliable or probative, and therefore could not establish realistic prospects of redressement. As a result the prévisionnel was discounted in the court's assessment and the liquidation judgment was confirmed.
- Why does SARL Galvalux c. Urssaf matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Evidence rejected in CA Douai. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about SARL Galvalux c. Urssaf?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this SARL Galvalux c. Urssaf summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.